Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy


PD wrote:
[snip]
> I've explained my objections to your ToE before. Insisting that protons
> and electrons *somehow* make up the aether that *somehow* conveys light
> *somehow* without attenuation doesn't cut it. You'd have to show how
> such a structure *could* convey light without attenuation, especially
> in view of the fact that other constructions of protons and electrons
> do seriously affect the passage of light.
>
I don't think it is that mysterious how it could transmit waves. We
know how sound waves travel through solids. This is exactly how light
travels through the aether. Since the aether particles are the smallest
units of matter with nothing else to interfere, I would not expect
there to be any frictional losses. The aether particles appear in a
true vacuum and we know a vacuum presents no frictional loses.
Therefore no attenuation would be expected in the medium except in
places where there is something to interfere with the normal crystal
lattice which explains why the presense of free protons and electrons
do seriously effect the passage of light. There's nothing unusual or
difficult to believe about it. I think I have explained all of your
"somehow's" with simple logic and example.

[snip]
> Actually, this explanation (for boyancy) has been around since the days of
> Archimedes, and works very well for boats, submarines, dirigibles,
> high-precision scales, skindiver weight belts, and so on and on. You
> should read up on it. :>)
> The buoyancy force happens to be equal to the weight of the fluid
> displaced. (You can use this fact to *derive* how the pressure in a
> fluid increases with depth.) In the case of a helium balloon, the
> weight of the balloon and the helium is less than the weight of the
> displaced air, and so the balloon rises.

I think you would have to admit that this isn't an explanation but
rather a description of how boyancy works. It explains "how" but not
"why" it works. I was just trying to show that an explanation of
dielectrophoresis does at least explain exactly "why" the boyancy
effect occurs as a reverse process of downward gravity which can be
mathematically proven.

[snip]

> > No, that's not true. Why do you think the force would be stronger in
> > and near galaxies? As galaxies gather together, they form pockets of
> > same space density and therefore have no incentive to spread out.
> > However, if there are any empty areas, the galaxies will all run away
> > from these areas because they are of a higher density and the weak
> > gravity from the galaxies at the other side will push the galaxies at
> > the other end further apart.
>
> No. It might take a little model to convince you of this fact, but a
> repulsive force *always* ends up in uniform distribution (not clumping)
> and an attractive force with any random fluctuation in density *always*
> ends up in clumping.
>

I would agree with your statements. Gravity acts as both an attractive
and repulsive force in my model (which is a very neat unification). At
close range, the attractive gravitational force is dominant and causes
matter to clump. At far range where matter is separated by a void, the
dominant force is repulsion. So the void effectively tries to form a
clump or a bubble and everything else gets pushed out as far as it can.
This would be analogous to blowing bubbles inside of a closed box where
the inside of the bubbles are the voids which are trying to reduce
their surface area, and the galaxies are the bubble walls. This is
exactly the pattern that is observed.

Also, you did say that dark matter was evenly distributed. If you read
the references from Sam Wormley, the significance is that when they
mapped dark matter, it was found to clump around galaxies. It is not
evenly distributed which indicates that dark matter is gravitationally
attracted and should be found assocated with real matter. This is a
reason why I suggested we test for the presence of dark matter around
the Earth by carefully checking the orbital parameters of satellites at
different heights.


> > > >
> > > > These theories are part of my theory of everything which can be found
> > > > at:
> > > > http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/theory.html
> > > >
> > > > fhudark

.

Relevant Pages
Loading