Re: New laws of motion?
Orion wrote:
> According to special relativity, motion does not require power. I think
> there must be, otherwise there wouldn't be gravity.
Interesting. I've never come accross this type of argument before. Can
you be more specific?
At any rate, do you have any specific comments about the paper I posted
the link for?
Happy new year
Joe
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: New laws of motion?
... motion does not require power. ... otherwise there wouldn't be gravity. ... According to special relativity the only thiing that EXISTS ...
(sci.physics) - Re: New laws of motion?
... > According to special relativity, motion does not require power. ... otherwise there wouldn't be gravity. ... Could you be more specific as to why motion in SR does not require any ...
(sci.physics) - Re: New laws of motion?
... motion does not require power. ... otherwise there wouldn't be gravity. ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.physics) - Newtons Principia: Definitions: I - IV
... The motion of the whole is the sum of the motions of all the parts; ... Of this sort is gravity, by which bodies tend to the centre of the ... earth, but would go off from it in a right line, and that with an ... accelerates all falling bodies, whether heavy or light, great or ...
(sci.physics) - Newtons Principia: Definitions: I - IV
... The motion of the whole is the sum of the motions of all the parts; ... Of this sort is gravity, by which bodies tend to the centre of the ... earth, but would go off from it in a right line, and that with an ... accelerates all falling bodies, whether heavy or light, great or ...
(sci.physics.relativity) |
|
