Re: The Turing test tells us nothing really.

Eureka!
I've got it by cracky I've got it.

What about operators? Human operators, who work for a company, like
answering service, and they are paid, to just sit there, in their
office, and they look through the eyes of your robot, and when you talk
to it, you talk to them, they use the net to look up stuff, and they
merely act as the humunculous for your robot!

Thats cheating but it is a way to do it without the positronic brain.

So you see, if the will was there, we could have robots a lot sooner
than you think.
They would be a hybrid type of machine though, using human intelligence
at first, and slowly the human operators would be replaced with
technology just as answering service is today.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Turing test tells us nothing really.
    ... Human operators, who work for a company, like ... > office, and they look through the eyes of your robot, and when you talk ... > Thats cheating but it is a way to do it without the positronic brain. ... > technology just as answering service is today. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: 6 Ss of Capable Home Robots
    ... "There is absolutely no reason why we can't have capable robot in our ... significant advancement in remote control ore teleprocessing ... skulls of human operators. ...
    (comp.robotics.misc)
  • Re: 6 Ss of Capable Home Robots
    ... "There is absolutely no reason why we can't have capable robot in our ... Autonomous robot airplanes for the military are relatively ... significant advancement in remote control ore teleprocessing ... skulls of human operators. ...
    (comp.robotics.misc)