Re: Cosmic Background Gravity, The Infinity Behind It, And Its Mirroring Any Past
- From: "glbrad01" <glbrad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:16:00 GMT
"glbrad01" <glbrad01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3htvf.710749$xm3.8603@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To start, my basic premises regarding the Universe may not be, nor look,
> anything like yours. Therefore the building over them may seem very
> strange and hard to follow. To me, a constant of cosmic background
> gravity, if there is such, would exist if the Universe is infinite but
> that "infinite" divided into local relative universes. The infinity would
> have and show gravitational attraction, but gravitational attraction not
> to any center of gravity at all, but exactly the opposite, a gravity
> attracting to the outside, attracting to the remotest 'rim' horizon from
> each and every center. "Center of gravity" being hub or core and each and
> every center of gravity having a rim, but all rims being merged into one
> constant of cosmic background gravity. It looks exactly the same as
> accelerating expansion to the Universe, expanding away from any and
> everywhere, but takes the place of it. Its farthest rim horizons of
> attraction to the outside from all point centers of gravity, such as the
> center of the Earth, is not any look of beginning time to the Universe,
> but is the horizon of light, or that portion of it that is the speed of
> light where gravitational acceleration that goes away from centers of
> gravity to distant rim horizons -- instead of coming to centers of
> gravity -- reaches a distant accelerated -- relative -- velocity that
> would finally match the speed of light, merging with the distant horizon
> of light, thus merging with the "timeless infinity of the Universe."
>
> There, would be the distant boundary horizon (fronting the infinity of
> frontier Universe in it, thus beyond it) of all local universes, including
> ours. Also it would have a dual use duality of dimensional character, the
> same as the other local universe bracketing horizon does, the infinity of
> Planck horizons fronting the precisely opposed infinitesimal to
> infinite -- as precisely opposed bracket and balancing weight. After all,
> an infinity of infinitesimals eqauls infinite, thus 'infinite' in opposing
> position to 'infinite' ("infinite" in opposing postion to itself. Thus
> [perfect] balance. Also, the fronting remote Horizon facing in opposed
> position the [many] fronting remote horizons which, in the total of them,
> equal the one: Thus still perfect balance, but this time at, in, the
> constants, and constancy, of the brackets timelessly, eternally,
> bracketing infinite numbers of local -- finite -- universes between).
>
> "Dual use duality of Character"?!?! A timeless infinity of Universe never
> permits the [reach to being out of all bounds] "infinite density,"
> "infinite temperature," "infinite lumination," or any other infinity bound
> singularly specific matters and/or energies. Physicists have never once in
> history realized all the [rest] of "infinity bound specifics" [cancel] all
> "infinity bound specifics". Whatever it is, it isn't done away with, not
> in the literal sense, but each and every "infinity" is cancelled by all of
> the other "infinities" (put "out of sight, out of mind," so to speak),
> leaving a finite constant (such as distantly collapsed "horizon," such as
> the "Planck constants," such as "local universe and the many of the local
> universes," such as "cosmic background....whatever," such as "electron,"
> "such as "galaxy," such as "appledom," and so on "entity," including
> indefinitely innumerable "entities" both of the stereotypical specific and
> of the generality of all possible specifics (where the infinities "put out
> of sight, out of mind" most WEIRDLY are ("weirdly," as in: unspecified
> generality of all can mean and is all possible weird things: all possible
> impossibly weird "weird universes")).
>
> Even the infinity of "distance-time" is cancelled, collapsed, specified
> into finite, constant -- but infinite in numbers, infinitely variable,
> specified "distance-time" horizons (here meaning, distance-time
> 'lengthes'): all of the foregoing, dual use duality of character (or
> multi-use multiplicity of character. Inclusively encompassing, it matters
> not which is used).
>
> The Planck mass, energy, temperature... constants have duality of
> character by also being islanded, or insular, entity horizon. Since all
> its constants are housed in one difficult to even imagine entity
> magnitudes of orders inside other atomic-subatomic, sub-sub-atomic, and so
> on, entities, it's not that difficult to imagine microscopic entity being
> a universal constant of Little Big Wimp infinitized in numbers of Little
> Big Wimps deep, deep within infinite numbers of the the sub-atomic,
> progressing up magnitudes or orders of levels of higher complexity until,
> suddenly, "infinite mass," "infinite density," is realized to be the ever
> constant norm of the Universe rather than any exception. But that infinite
> mass, that infinite density, is broken into infinite numbers of islanded
> locals due to hard ungiving forever "TIMELESS" finite constants, fractal
> self-similar hard in a counterpart in the top-horizon-down (to its
> bottom-horizon-up). A dual use duality of character.
>
> The top, or outside, "bracket" remote horizon fronting infinite Universe
> (just as the Planck horizon fronts its counterpart infinitesimal Universe
> is entirely self-similar to itself (exactly the same Universe when "NOT
> relative") represented at the bottom, or inside. It not only fronts the
> infinite Universe, but with its dual use duality of character it then [in
> distant local universe horizon] represents the overall constants of that
> vastness of mass, the energy, the temperature.... in full representation
> all in itself, forever constant. All universal horizons, such as the speed
> of light [in hard vacuum] are -- however redundant this sounds --
> universally constant horizons. This one is, via dual use duality of
> dimensional character, the so-called Big Bang (actually the Big Little
> Bang), but, forever frozen constant in being everywhere.
>
> "Horror of horrors.....how?!?!" Why the "shadowlands" of course. Via the
> shadowlands, the shadowland universes. Where the forever constant of
> cosmic background gravity in representive acceleration of velocities
> [falling away] from anywhere in any local universe however situate will
> forever constantly, finally, match up with and merge with light's constant
> horizon, its velocity in a hard vacuum. Dual use duality of dimensional
> character (multi-use multiplicity of character), "everythingness is
> nothingness," "nothingness is everythingness."
>
> Nothing else but the honorable Mr. Albert Einstein's "mind's-eye trip" to
> the velocity of light in hard vacuum could have caused me to think of
> following him up to see for myself "timelessness," and "infinity." The
> timeless infinity of the Universe. The timeless infinity of Universe.
>
> On the "expansion of the Universe" but not really:
>
> When I took that mind's eye trip to follow up on Mr. Einstein's, when I
> accelerated up in velocity at just a slow one-Earth gravity constant of
> boost, I found my local self and my local means of transportation
> EXPANDING just as has been predicted and illustrated occasionally before
> (quite often humorously by those not in the know of what it really means,
> or imaginative enough to try to realize it). But now we know about the
> shadowlands universes, realizing via indirect observations, and more
> direct effects, that something, SOMETHING!, quite invisible to us, and
> collisionless with us and ours, exists out there. Probable
> hyper-spatial -- and quite possibly hyper-timely as well (probably
> necessary to be that "as well" also) -- shadow matter, shadow energy,
> shadow stars, shadow galaxies, ergo shadowland relative local
> universes.....indirectly noticed to be cross-horizons' gravitational in
> effects, and if so, effectively -- regarding that particular effect --
> super-conducting "highways" tailor made to super-conduct assist
> inter-(whatever) travelers in travel between far away destinations. With
> all the sledge-hints I've given, have you yet begun in your own "mind's
> eye," like Mr. Einstein's, and like mine, to see the how of such a thing?
> A how that in no way transcends the velocity of light or uses so-called
> wormholes. A how, that here on Earth, [physically really] speaking, at
> once also [relatively] speaking (one and the same), causes the effect of
> so-called "fly over country" beneath a lot of travelers on Earth already.
> The effect of shrinking the remote when going away from it. The optical
> illusory effect of your own expansion up and outward in the Universe,
> increasingly synchronizing expansion with it level by level by level, to
> get anywhere, then shrink back down [toward] your destination getting more
> and ever more relative to it all the time as you shrink [toward] it,
> expanding it proportionately. As far as the velocity of light would be
> concerned, you never once moved from your stand by the side of Mr.
> Einstein's train track, thus it too never once changed its constancy
> relative to your constancy in any way, shape, or form. And never once do
> you, as a 30 year old, ever meet your 80 year old children when you are
> still 30 years old, relatively speaking that is.
>
> Thank you Mr. Einstein wherever-whenever-however you might be, though I
> realize you yourself probably were never aware of the full implications of
> your visualizations and realizations. Certainly your adherents for almost
> a century drew so many wrong conclusions in projection that they could
> not. But, like you, they were not infinity minded; not infinity based; so
> had an absolute handicap, an absolute flaw, they could never even possibly
> overcome. But I would not now be here, in this, if you had not been there
> first (however short of full realization you came). I don't call many men
> at all "Mr." but from now on you are Mr. Einstein. You have my deepest
> apologies for wrongs I've tried to do to your name in the past before I
> knew better 'Relativity'.
>
> GLB
>
Jeez! I took so long doing this, I forgot all about my realization of a
possibly perfect gravity mirror fooling us as to what we think we are
looking at beyond approximately 6.3 light years out. My deepest apologies
for being incomplete.
I don't think we can observe anything of the Universe beyond a point far,
far short of a where and when of a local universe we think we are observing.
In 3-D geometry, gravity has depth. Cosmic background gravity would gain
incredibly in horizons of depth, relative to view from a great distance,
with all increasing distance-time going away from anywhere in any direction.
As a few of you (I'm afraid a very few) know, beyond a certain point of
depth all depth going away beyond that certain point of depth appears to
close up toward observers, to that certain point away in distance-time, and
collapse all view of that depth and of anything further. The result of that
collapse is a more or less solid wall....or in certain circumstances with
certain inherent environmental ingredients, a mirror as that solid wall.
Gravity at a distance is the most perfect mirroring agency anyway that could
ever be devised, as most of you already know.
Sometime ago the apparent acceleration in the Universe was measured -- via
"Cepheid's" (I think it is spelled (I'm not going to look it up for now)) at
varying distances going away from us -- an increase of approximately 160,000
mph every 3,000,000 light years of rings of latitude (centered upon us)
going away into the Universe in distance-time. By my admittedly imperfect
primitive calculation that put the distant "horizon" of the velocity of
light (being accelerated to from anywhere in the Universe) in the distant
reaches of the Universe to be an approximate distance in distance-time of
about 12.6 billion light years away from anywhere. But the average of
velocity, observed as light years in distance to years in time, light years
per years, reduces to exactly the base unit of the velocity of light as
measured in a hard vacuum, 1 light second per second, or a ratio of 1 light
second of distance to every second of time in every line of distance-time
going away from anywhere. So the velocity of light pervades the Universe
uniformly regardless of all uniform acceleration observed toward it from
local frames anywhere in the Universe.
But there is a glitch, a hiccup, an anomaly, a leveling off for some
little distance-time (if any cosmic distance-time can be called "little")
that has been observed approximately 6.3 billion light years on the way up.
It has bothered me from day one I heard about it. It throws on the trash
heap as completely useless the measurement of approximately 12.6 billion
light years in distance-time to the velocity of light the acceleration is
to. As to what is, it is more than likely the placement of cosmic background
gravity's [perfect] mirror horizon, reflecting in the clear, clear as a
bell, so to speak, anywhere's distant history back to it. It would move as
anywhere moved, placing anywhere in the dead center core of a 3-D bubble of
local universe impossible to view out of to anything beyond. But like any
shallow dead still pool of clear water reflecting back your own image there
would be some nice depth ("a glitch, a hiccup, an anomaly, a leveling off")
to the integrity of it before it completely slammed the door to penetration
to any beyond.
I've ranted and raged as to why if we are viewing an exquisite arrow and
line of time going straight back to some Big Bang, we aren't viewing any
line of [our own] past as a line along it when we most certainly should be
viewing it in very detailed straight line back through some time line to
that Bang. No such thing exists when looking in a reflecting mirror,
especially an absolutely perfect mirror approximately 6.3 to 6.x (deep)
billion light years, and 6.3 to 6.x (deep) billion years, in the distance,
in distance-time. No wonder the astonishment and confusion of astronomers
and cosmological physicists concerning Hubble's imaging of very distant
objects to discover no blurring anywhere in the picture. There wouldn't be
any as we look at the Milky Way and its own immediate region, as by far the
most distant object of all objects in the mirror (being the dead center
object of a bubble always focused upon it forever or until the Milky Way
gives up the ghost), as it was approximately 14 billion years ago (rounded
off). Because of some depth to the mirror, we would never see it as it was
twice 6.3 to 6.x billion years ago. I've ranted and raged over that too, why
are the most distant images of all, the most frozen in time relative to us
(relative to anywhere) when they should be no more frozen in motion than
Andromeda. A perfect mirror focused forever on us as the center of the
bubble and feedback (therefore focused upon anywhere that is the permanent
center of its own bubble for all feedback) solves that dilemma too.
The frozen focus on us is "relativistic" to the max. The Milky Way as the
motionless center, and the cosmic background lensed mirroring focusing upon
the Milky Way permanently until the end of the Milky Way when both forever
tied together will just go away, together form between them a super titanic
Einsteinian relativistic "inertial frame" [in view].
Whew!
GLB
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Milk and Orange Juice Anyone?
- Next by Date: curses
- Previous by thread: Re: Cosmic Background Gravity, The Infinity Behind It, And Its Mirroring Any Past
- Next by thread: Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
