Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.

I have decided to show to whom ever may be interested:

1) that this law as stated by "F=ma" is down right wrong and incorrectly
justified
2) where has the originator failed to correctly comprehend and interpret
the standard experimental evidence
3) the correct relationship between force, mass and acceleration easily
derived from static pressure in liquids and expressed by F=1/2ma^2.

http://www3.sympatico.ca/slavek.krepelka/ttf2/force1.htm

My kind regards, Slavek
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
    ... > 1) that this law is down right wrong and unjustified ... > regards, Slavek ... I have decided to ignore arrogant incompetent arseholes. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Newton Second Law of Motion
    ... that this law is down right wrong and unjustified ... regards, Slavek ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
    ... > 1) that this law is down right wrong and unjustified ... Gee, how did they ever make it to the moon, I wonder. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
    ... > 1) that this law is down right wrong and unjustified ... > interpret the experimental evidence ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Newtons Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
    ... > 2) where has the originator failed to correctly comprehend and interpret ... > derived from static pressure in liquids and expressed by F=1/2ma^2. ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast