Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
- From: slavek krepelka <slavek.krepelka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:40:36 -0800
PD wrote:
>
> slavek krepelka wrote:
> > I have decided to show to whom ever may be interested:
> >
> > 1) that this law as stated by "F=ma" is down right wrong and incorrectly
> > justified
> > 2) where has the originator failed to correctly comprehend and interpret
> > the standard experimental evidence
> > 3) the correct relationship between force, mass and acceleration easily
> > derived from static pressure in liquids and expressed by F=1/2ma^2.
> >
> > http://www3.sympatico.ca/slavek.krepelka/ttf2/force1.htm
> >
> > My kind regards, Slavek
>
> Your criticism is based on erroneous assumptions and incorrect
> understanding of the term "weightlessness".
>
> You say for example:
> ================
> "Everybody" knows that the acceleration in the free fall is a balancing
> act between inertia of a mass and gravitation. If there is no
> acceleration of a body toward ground, the body weights the full
> equivalent of its mass, i.e. its full weight, in our case 1 kg. When
> the body is accelerating at the free fall rate toward ground, it is
> weightless. When a body is hindered in its free fall by a force smaller
> than the gravitational force and opposing the gravitational force, its
> weight is in some proportion to the strength of the opposing force.
> =================
> This analysis is in fact incorrect, and it is not true that "everybody"
> knows this. Indeed, I would say that only onebody know it.
>
> PD
It appears that you have never taken a ride in a fast elevator. It might
help your understanding of effects of acceleration on weight to take a
once in a lifetime trip from your village and visit some larger urban
center. This will give you and unprecedented opportunity to test ride a
fast elevator in some high-rise building and directly observe what
happens to weight with accelerating as well as decelerating of the
elevator, up as well as down. You'll be truly amazed. Then talk to me
about weight again if you still feel like it.
My kind regards, Slavek.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
- From: slavek krepelka
- Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
- From: PD
- Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
- Prev by Date: Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
- Next by Date: Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
- Previous by thread: Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
- Next by thread: Re: Newton's Second Law of Motion is not even wrong.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
