Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2


The old Sorcerer wrote:
> "Mike Jr." <n00spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1137261766.146500.47270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > "Albert Einstein was correct in his prediction that E=mc2, according to
> > scientists at the Commerce Department's National Institute of
> > Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Massachusetts Institute of
> > Technology (MIT) who conducted the most precise direct test ever of
> > what is perhaps the most famous formula in science."
> >
> > http://www.physlink.com/News/051229Emc2Einstein.cfm
> >
> > --Mike Jr.
>
> Which is not E = mc²/sqrt(1-v²/c²) as Einstein predicted

No? What do you think the difference between those numbers
would be for this experiment?

- Randy

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: NIST and MIT Confirm that E= mc2
    ... > scientists at the Commerce Department's National Institute of ... > Standards and Technology and the Massachusetts Institute of ... > Technology who conducted the most precise direct test ever of ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What kind of coffee is free at your office? ...
    ... you're saying Richard can advertise as "The Official Espresso ... Machine of the National Institute of Standards and Technology." ...
    (alt.coffee)
  • Re: In memory of New Orleans
    ... >>And as you know, Bob, in 1988 it became the National Institute of ... >>Standards & Technology. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Is 1,5 singular or plural ?
    ... NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), ... bureau or somesuch of the US government. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: RTFM - NIST SP 800-56A
    ... USA National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ... Special Publication 800-56A ...
    (comp.security.misc)