Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?
- From: gaya.patel@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 19 Jan 2006 19:47:19 -0800
Can someone explain the sentence "newtonian mechanics are only valid
froma nonaccelerating frame of reference"?
Thanks a bunch (I've already tried google search)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?
- From: Gregory L. Hansen
- Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?
- From: Mike
- Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?
- From: Timo Nieminen
- Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?
- From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?
- Prev by Date: Rigid Body?
- Next by Date: Is non-continous calculus needed for physics?
- Previous by thread: Rigid Body?
- Next by thread: Re: Newtons Mechanics only valid from nonaccelerating frame of reference?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|