Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Timo Nieminen <uqtniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:36:31 +1000
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Ken S. Tucker wrote:
I find nonorthogonal axes easier than orthogonal,
Then you must be some kind of bizarre freak of nature!!!
indeed a Curl becomes A_u,v - A_v,u (== &A_u/&x^v - &A_v/&x^u), because manipulating equations in tensors is streamlined by notation.
Can't you just do that with orthogonal metrics too? (Mixing covariant and contravariant is just a naughty little trick to hide the metric tensor!)
-- Timo .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- References:
- resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: kenneth . bull
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: mmeron
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- Prev by Date: Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- Next by Date: Re: Is non-continous calculus needed for physics?
- Previous by thread: Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- Next by thread: Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- Index(es):