Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Hero.van.Jindelt@xxxxxx
- Date: 23 Jan 2006 00:40:45 -0800
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> It's reasonable to consider 5D, just look around your office and
> see that your desk is denser than the air above it, so far so good.
> OTOH, the density of the desk may be described by a 4D warp.
> Some physicists perfer to impose a 5th D variable on an orthogonal
> 4D, but then that becomes a nonorthogonal 4D, as in GR.
Can You explain, how a fourth dimension can be orthogonal to the three
of space, measured in cm³?
My results so far: Density ( Volume of particles /( Volume of space
swept out by particles in movement) ) can be described in assigning a
value of density [ cm³/ cm³] to every point of Your desk and the air
above it. This makes a scalar field.
Regards
Hero
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- References:
- resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: kenneth . bull
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: mmeron
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Timo Nieminen
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- Prev by Date: Re: automated physical dimensions and units in scientific programs
- Next by Date: Re: HIV/AIDS As Fear-Anger Phases vs Acceleration-Deceleration Phases
- Previous by thread: Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- Next by thread: Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|