Re: Is time dilation real?




Gary Matthews wrote:

> Time dialation observed by clocks due to increase or decrease in speed
> would effect anybody within the moving frame relitive to the non moving
> refferance frame. All clocks including the cesium clock are effected by
> localised time relitive to its motion in space. If we where to say
> travel instantly in a strait line out to some point in the universe and
> stop relitve to the motion of our galaxy which might take a few billion
> years to rotate and is spinning and traveling at the near speed of
> light through the universe. After some mesured local time like a year
> we returned instantly to our orignial location the perseption of time
> passed for those that remained might be negligable although we had been
> gone a year. On the other hand if we speed up to near the speed of
> light and continue to travel for what we might observe as one year
> might be observed as 100 years back on earth. Our model of time is
> wired based on the fact that for use time for us is allways relitive to
> the planet we exist on. Even moving through time slower or faster
> relitive to earth would not effect our perception of time unless we
> where able to observe the frame of refferance relitive to our local
> frame. We would not see people speeding up or slowing down unless we
> can observ all the relivent frames at once which so far is technicly
> and hypotheticly impossible.

Gary,
If I look in a curved mirror, I "seem to be" shorter/taller, due to the
alteration to light's direction.
If a distant event "seems to be" occurring at a different time, that is
due to the speed of light being FINITE .
So don't look in a mirror! If time really does physically alter, then
so does your length!
Events are happening NOW billions of (units of length) away. It will be
a long period before we receive that information. If you lack the
patience, head out in the direction of the event.

Jim G
c'=c+v

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ton of Bricks Paradox/Contradiction?
    ... they are not consistent within any one frame. ... Moving clocks are measured to undergo time dilation. ... Moving rods are measured to undergo length contraction. ... observers. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relativity and Clocks
    ... > unsynchronised (in frame 2) by exactly the time difference of the two ... > showing on the clocks and the different arrival times of the two ... physics at the start of the twentieth century. ... > the idea that every moving body in the universe is under the influence ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is time dilation real?
    ... Time dialation observed by clocks due to increase or decrease in speed ... would effect anybody within the moving frame relitive to the non moving ... refferance frame. ... where able to observe the frame of refferance relitive to our local ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: More Trouble for Relativity
    ... the cause of the time delay for a moving clock is its ... |>>rate for those clocks, respect the GC or respect one to the other. ... |>>frame the GC is at rest the two OC are moving with constant speed. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: I am Trying To Learn Relativity
    ... logical contradictions in relativity. ... two directions or where the frame jumping took place. ... He thne conludes that the clocks are not synched. ... A simple one is that the rod is moving, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)

Quantcast