Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: "photonics" <ramgopan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jan 2006 07:32:33 -0800
Thanks for the views. I was embarassed to see the first response within
the first five hrs. I am happy that there are good people still around.
The point is, Science or Physics never ends up simply looking at what
happens around you, and how it happens (Biology does sometimes, not
always). It goes deep inside asking why it happens. That's what you see
VERY CLEARLY in the progress we made in understanding gravity since the
historical apple fall.
Infact, I would say that Universe is so random in a micro sense.
Completely probablistic. Single small events can happen in enumerous
ways in a micro scale, but always adding up to defined (sometimes)
statistical collective nature. I do not understand why people give away
all fundamental problems to religion and holy cows. If that's the case
with you folks (any of you), I am open to say that better you try
something else.
Take the example of diffusion, many of you must have derived diffusion
equation from random walk concepts.
You can not deny memory (at least you could have read that ZRAM blog
yourself, to think better). Something that doesnt change apparently can
carry information. Thats what memory is. Energy conservation is one
thing that keeps Universe from completely randomness. To change a state
you need energy, but how would you get that? As long as it doesnt get
energy it stays just as it is.
Newton's first law.
I would call Physics Newtonian religion if you simply stop at laws and
never dare to look deep. That's holy cow, if you get me correctly.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Androcles
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Michael Varney
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- References:
- physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Mike
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Androcles
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Androcles
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Mike
- physical laws and the universe
- Prev by Date: Interpretation of the complex wavefunction (Bohr, Einstein or Feynman) ?
- Next by Date: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
- Previous by thread: Re: physical laws and the universe
- Next by thread: Re: physical laws and the universe
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|