Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Michael Varney <varney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:19:55 -0700
photonics wrote:
Thanks for the views. I was embarassed to see the first response within the first five hrs. I am happy that there are good people still around.
Rather than whine about how you perceive since should be done, you should learn how it is done. You learn its limitations and its strengths.
The question of if I am a good person or not is independent on the scope of science.
The point is, Science or Physics never ends up simply looking at what happens around you, and how it happens (Biology does sometimes, not always). It goes deep inside asking why it happens.
No, it cannot.
I doubt you will understand that basic point though. Are you a crackpot perchance? I have noticed that many crackpots think that science can answer the why.
That's what you see VERY CLEARLY in the progress we made in understanding gravity since the historical apple fall.
*sigh*
Infact, I would say that Universe is so random in a micro sense.
Who cares what you would say? Obviously the universe does not care... it just is.
Completely probablistic. Single small events can happen in enumerous ways in a micro scale, but always adding up to defined (sometimes) statistical collective nature. I do not understand why people give away all fundamental problems to religion and holy cows. If that's the case with you folks (any of you), I am open to say that better you try something else.
Wow... that was wishy washy. Me thinks you are a crank.
Take the example of diffusion, many of you must have derived diffusion equation from random walk concepts.
Have you?
You can not deny memory (at least you could have read that ZRAM blog yourself, to think better). Something that doesnt change apparently can carry information. Thats what memory is. Energy conservation is one thing that keeps Universe from completely randomness. To change a state you need energy, but how would you get that? As long as it doesnt get energy it stays just as it is.
Bull*** meter is pegging here.
Newton's first law.
I would call Physics Newtonian religion if you simply stop at laws and never dare to look deep. That's holy cow, if you get me correctly.
Yup. You are a crackpot.
I should have sniffed it out from the first and simply ridiculed you. You have no real interest in science, so why are you posting here? .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Spaceman
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Traveler
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- References:
- physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Mike
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Androcles
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Androcles
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Mike
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- physical laws and the universe
- Prev by Date: Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?
- Next by Date: Re: best angle to release the ball is 30 degrees?
- Previous by thread: Re: physical laws and the universe
- Next by thread: Re: physical laws and the universe
- Index(es):