Re: physical laws and the universe


"photonics" <ramgopan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138203153.461023.89390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks for the views. I was embarassed to see the first response within
> the first five hrs. I am happy that there are good people still around.
>
> The point is, Science or Physics never ends up simply looking at what
> happens around you, and how it happens (Biology does sometimes, not
> always). It goes deep inside asking why it happens. That's what you see
> VERY CLEARLY in the progress we made in understanding gravity since the
> historical apple fall.
>
> Infact, I would say that Universe is so random in a micro sense.
> Completely probablistic. Single small events can happen in enumerous
> ways in a micro scale, but always adding up to defined (sometimes)
> statistical collective nature. I do not understand why people give away
> all fundamental problems to religion and holy cows. If that's the case
> with you folks (any of you), I am open to say that better you try
> something else.
>
> Take the example of diffusion, many of you must have derived diffusion
> equation from random walk concepts.
>
> You can not deny memory (at least you could have read that ZRAM blog
> yourself, to think better). Something that doesnt change apparently can
> carry information. Thats what memory is. Energy conservation is one
> thing that keeps Universe from completely randomness. To change a state
> you need energy, but how would you get that? As long as it doesnt get
> energy it stays just as it is.
>
> Newton's first law.
>
> I would call Physics Newtonian religion if you simply stop at laws and
> never dare to look deep. That's holy cow, if you get me correctly.


When the apple jumps back on the tree I'll concede your point.
Until then I'm sticking with the laws of Newtonian religion, holy cow.
Androcles.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK
    ... normal laws of physics that suck, ... strong energy signature within the UV spectrum, ... Onward to the other somewhat important topic of 'Life on Venus' ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: MAILGATE sucks, or at least NSA/MI6 sucks
    ... Apparently it's not MAILGATE that sucks, as it's the normal laws of ... physics need be applied whenever questioning whatever's lord NASA ... strong energy signature within the UV spectrum, ... Onward to the other somewhat important topic of 'Life on Venus' ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Science/Physics Forums that SUCK
    ... normal laws of physics that suck, ... strong energy signature within the UV spectrum, ... Onward to the other somewhat important topic of 'Life on Venus' ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist?
    ... >| out of reality so fast the laws of physics don't notice and so can act ... "The conservation law of mass and energy states that you can't get ... the electron has created a photon out of seemingly nothing. ... "Suppose that a fundamental particle ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Can energy conservation be derived from Newtons motion laws
    ... >>force satisfies conservation of energy given Newton's laws. ... > axiom of physics. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
Loading