Re: Is time dilation real?

"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:K56dnehlEYSNLkrenZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:c7OBf.731250$_o.510942@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> | Space*** wrote:
> |
> | >
> | > All clocks are not affected at the same rate.
> | > Grandfather clock, hourglasses, sundials, etc.
> | > time dilation is a clock malfunction that depends on the clocks
> | > inner workings and the changes it passes through such as g-force
> | > acceleration etc..
> | >
> |
> | Here is where space*** fails to comprehend... it is time that
> | is affected by relative motion and gravitation, hence all clocks
> | and all processes will show the effect.
>
> Here is what Sam fails to comprhend, it is clocks that are affected
> by relative motion and not all clocks are affected the exact same,
> hence Sam is a clock illiterate rubber ruler worshipping moron that
> is constantly infactuated with *** in space.
>
> An hourglass is smarter than Sam.
> lol

Perhaps you think that it's just coincidence that every
type of clock tested so far (from subatomic particle
decay times to atomic clocks flown on aircraft to
GPS clocks in space) show *exactly* the same effect
regardless of their composition or mechanism?

You're arguing against observed facts.


.