Re: Is time dilation real?


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:HLSBf.23225$ve.365377@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| *You* think that physics is about the "why". That is
| your *opinion* and is not fact. Ask any practicing
| physicist and he'll tell you that physics is about the
| *how*, not the *why*. If you insist on forcing your
| definitions on things, then you are bound to forever
| be disappointed.

<snipped rest of ignorance>

physics : the science that deals with matter, energy, motion
and force.

science : a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of
facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of
general laws.

hmm?
'showing the operation of general laws' is not the same as showing why,
according to general laws?
It is sad you think it is not.
for simply you have lost the science part of physics.
Of course, that is your loss, not mine.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is time dilation real?
    ... |> physics: the science that deals with matter, energy, motion ... |> 'showing the operation of general laws' is not the same as showing why, ... I have never stated the clocks are not as good as they could be ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is time dilation real?
    ... > physics: the science that deals with matter, energy, motion ... > 'showing the operation of general laws' is not the same as showing why, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Editorial: Big shots....
    ... post on sci.physics showing how well establish physics is wrong and ... of their posts would certainly be different than what the hoards of ... cranks post here. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Materialist Evolutionists
    ... showing the implausibility of epiphenomenalism or the consideration ... physical activity following laws of physics. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? [ scientific methods ]
    ... > That may be true for your science, and for some possibly Post Modernist ... of physics are like that eg the law of conservation of energy is no more ... should not be used - its context is not well defined. ... >> training but not of the type used in philosophy which is along the lines ...
    (sci.physics)