Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is...
- From: Michael Varney <varney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:51:16 -0700
mmeron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In article <1138180920.850991.38540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "platopes" <platopes@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Michael Varney wrote:
Marco Dorantes wrote:
Do you agree with the following statement?
Any statement will have someone who disagrees with it.
Not true.
:-)))
Don't you just love it when the perfect setup succeeds! .
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is...
- From: Marco Dorantes
- Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is...
- From: Michael Varney
- Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is...
- From: platopes
- Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is...
- From: mmeron
- Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is...
- Prev by Date: Re: Is time dilation real?
- Next by Date: Re: Is time dilation real?
- Previous by thread: Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is...
- Next by thread: Re: Sine qua non attribute for a science to exist is...
- Index(es):