Re: Is time dilation real?


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:zCTBf.23276$ve.370033@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| A famous quote says that, "Things should be made as
| simple as possible, but no simpler." That things
| aren't in reality as simple as you would like does
| not argue against reality, but rather your simplicity.

I have not made mine simpler,
I could, yet I stopped at the crucial point that should be known
It is your simplicity that can not grasp such.
Or maybe, it is complications in the logic portion of your brain
either way. you seem to now be able to grasp the simple.
and that is in no way, my fault.


| What conditions? You haven't stated what conditions can
| affect every tested clock in exactly the same manner,
| nor what these supposed "fundamental faults" are.

I have to,
you are such a bull*** artist it is getting really sad you need to pull
such bull*** to keep your rubber ruler worshipping alive.

| Now you're just treading water. Admit it, you've got
| nothing.

I have cause,
the cause I give is backed up by your worship material.
You are to lost in the complicated to see the simplicty anymore.
The clock malfunctioned and if it did not, then you have a perfect clock
that screws up when accelerated.. lol

:)


.