Re: Is time dilation real?

"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:sKGdnRFUW_mRn0XenZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:WXSBf.23240$ve.366275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | Time dilation is due to an observed property of the
> | universe, to wit, the rate of flow of time in a
> | moving frame of reference as measured by an observer
> | is seen to depend upon the relative velocity of the
> | system under observation.
>
> No,
> time dilation is due to clocks malfunctioning.
> and..
> simple words beat complex bull*** everyday.
> :)

Argument by assertion carries no weight.

A famous quote says that, "Things should be made as
simple as possible, but no simpler." That things
aren't in reality as simple as you would like does
not argue against reality, but rather your simplicity.

>
>
> | In other words, the change is due to a fundamental
> | behavior in the way the universe works.
>
> no,
> it is due to the fundamental faults of a clock in such
> conditions.

What conditions? You haven't stated what conditions can
affect every tested clock in exactly the same manner,
nor what these supposed "fundamental faults" are.

>
> <snipped boring blah blah blah about rubber rulers and broken clock gods
> ruling the universe.>

Now you're just treading water. Admit it, you've got
nothing.


.

Quantcast