Re: physical laws and the universe

Thanks Michael Varney. I didnt know that such a great think tank like
you is in this group. Please be patient until others read and post
their views on it.

And remember, frustration is not Science.

Michael Varney wrote:
> photonics wrote:
> > Thanks for the views. I was embarassed to see the first response within
> > the first five hrs. I am happy that there are good people still around.
>
> Rather than whine about how you perceive since should be done, you
> should learn how it is done. You learn its limitations and its strengths.
> The question of if I am a good person or not is independent on the scope
> of science.
>
> > The point is, Science or Physics never ends up simply looking at what
> > happens around you, and how it happens (Biology does sometimes, not
> > always). It goes deep inside asking why it happens.
>
> No, it cannot.
> I doubt you will understand that basic point though. Are you a crackpot
> perchance? I have noticed that many crackpots think that science can
> answer the why.
>
> > That's what you see
> > VERY CLEARLY in the progress we made in understanding gravity since the
> > historical apple fall.
>
> *sigh*
>
> > Infact, I would say that Universe is so random in a micro sense.
>
> Who cares what you would say? Obviously the universe does not care... it
> just is.
>
> > Completely probablistic. Single small events can happen in enumerous
> > ways in a micro scale, but always adding up to defined (sometimes)
> > statistical collective nature. I do not understand why people give away
> > all fundamental problems to religion and holy cows. If that's the case
> > with you folks (any of you), I am open to say that better you try
> > something else.
>
> Wow... that was wishy washy. Me thinks you are a crank.
>
> > Take the example of diffusion, many of you must have derived diffusion
> > equation from random walk concepts.
>
> Have you?
>
> > You can not deny memory (at least you could have read that ZRAM blog
> > yourself, to think better). Something that doesnt change apparently can
> > carry information. Thats what memory is. Energy conservation is one
> > thing that keeps Universe from completely randomness. To change a state
> > you need energy, but how would you get that? As long as it doesnt get
> > energy it stays just as it is.
>
> Bull*** meter is pegging here.
>
> > Newton's first law.
> >
> > I would call Physics Newtonian religion if you simply stop at laws and
> > never dare to look deep. That's holy cow, if you get me correctly.
>
> Yup. You are a crackpot.
>
> I should have sniffed it out from the first and simply ridiculed you.
> You have no real interest in science, so why are you posting here?

.

Quantcast