Re: physical laws and the universe

photonics wrote:
Thanks Michael Varney.

Thank me after you have learned something. You have not learned that top posting is the sign of a Usenet turd. You have not learned what the applicability and scope of science.


I didnt know that such a great think tank

You obviously do not know what a think tank is, and you seem to bandy about terminology at will but without understanding.
www.google.com "how to use google"


like
you is in this group. Please be patient until others read and post
their views on it.


You have not learned now not to be a crank yet.


And remember, frustration is not Science.

And you have not learned the science process. Science is frustrating as hell. It is hard work, and the results you get sometimes will clash with your preconceived notions. You are frustrated by ignorant dolts who control funding, buy dumb*** Luddites who fear the results, and by cranks who, like little monkeys in the trees, throw *** at you and screech.

Learn to stop screeching and throwing ***, crackpot photonics.

Michael Varney wrote:

photonics wrote:

Thanks for the views. I was embarassed to see the first response within
the first five hrs. I am happy that there are good people still around.


Rather than whine about how you perceive since should be done, you
should learn how it is done. You learn its limitations and its strengths.
The question of if I am a good person or not is independent on the scope
of science.


The point is, Science or Physics never ends up simply looking at what
happens around you, and how it happens (Biology does sometimes, not
always). It goes deep inside asking why it happens.


No, it cannot.
I doubt you will understand that basic point though. Are you a crackpot
perchance? I have noticed that many crackpots think that science can
answer the why.


That's what you see
VERY CLEARLY in the progress we made in understanding gravity since the
historical apple fall.


*sigh*


Infact, I would say that Universe is so random in a micro sense. 

Who cares what you would say? Obviously the universe does not care... it
just is.


Completely probablistic. Single small events can happen in enumerous
ways in a micro scale, but always adding up to defined (sometimes)
statistical collective nature. I do not understand why people give away
all fundamental problems to religion and holy cows. If that's the case
with you folks (any of you), I am open to say that better you try
something else.


Wow... that was wishy washy. Me thinks you are a crank.


Take the example of diffusion, many of you must have derived diffusion
equation from random walk concepts.


Have you?


You can not deny memory (at least you could have read that ZRAM blog
yourself, to think better). Something that doesnt change apparently can
carry information. Thats what memory is. Energy conservation is one
thing that keeps Universe from completely randomness. To change a state
you need energy, but how would you get that? As long as it doesnt get
energy it stays just as it is.


Bull*** meter is pegging here.


Newton's first law.

I would call Physics Newtonian religion if you simply stop at laws and
never dare to look deep. That's holy cow, if you get me correctly.


Yup. You are a crackpot.

I should have sniffed it out from the first and simply ridiculed you.
You have no real interest in science, so why are you posting here?



.

Quantcast