Re: What creates the Charge?
- From: "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jan 2006 10:37:20 -0800
Spaceman wrote:
> "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1138299564.941070.293060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | You say this as though it were obvious. It is not. It is an
> | unsupported, philosophical assertion. If you want to state it as a
> | postulate, and then probe the implications of that postulate to see if
> | it matches up with reality, then experiment would settle the issue. By
> | the way, it is measurably not the case.
>
> If a 'void' is shown to have matter in it,
> It is not truly a void any longer and prob never was.
> :)
I wasn't referring to a void with matter in it. :>)
PD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What creates the Charge?
- From: Spaceman
- Re: What creates the Charge?
- References:
- What creates the Charge?
- From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: What creates the Charge?
- From: Aetherist
- Re: What creates the Charge?
- From: ma1ibu
- Re: What creates the Charge?
- From: Aetherist
- Re: What creates the Charge?
- From: PD
- Re: What creates the Charge?
- From: Spaceman
- What creates the Charge?
- Prev by Date: Re: Maxwell and Heaviside
- Next by Date: Re: resolve to perpendicular components, because they are independent
- Previous by thread: Re: What creates the Charge?
- Next by thread: Re: What creates the Charge?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|