Re: Is time dilation real?


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kp8Cf.24721$ve.474455@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| There's your problem, James. You're ignoring the
| experimental results, choosing your own fantasy
| world over cold hard reality. You still haven't
| looked at the reference showing the experiment
| and its results, have you?

I have looked,
End result proves the nonsense they spout about
the clocks not changing rate to be just that, nonsense.

you are the one that seems to be ignoring the end result
and just accepting this bull*** about the clocks running at
the correct rate in the FoR's they are in.
That is all bull***,.
If the clocks ran at the correct rate all the time,
all the clocks would still have the same time on them
when brought back together.

| Nothing changed their inherent rates: They ran
| perfectly when observed in their own frames
| of reference.

Wrong,
They must have had a rate change of they would nto have different
times.
You can think they ran at the correct rate all you want,
but the end result proves they did not do such.


| Your failing to accept experimental results is
| a demonstration of willful ignorance. James,
| ignorance can be corrected. Stoopidity is
| forever. You don't want people to think you're
| stupid, do you?

You are ignoring the end results Greg,
You are the one showing willfull ignorance.

How can a clock keep the same rate as another clock
and yet show different times when brought back together?
It is a joke you don't seem to gather why it is so wrong
it is not even worthy of being called science with such
bull*** being spouted.


.