Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Michael Varney <varney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:47:00 -0700
photonics wrote:
There is nothing wrong in doing one's own science as far as one is able to produce results.
You have changed the subject. Also, you have still learned not to top post, you ignorant ***.
The subject was you thinking that science can answer the "why". It cannot. Now you are belching on about doing ones own science.
Lets try to keep things on track here, crackpot.
Why do you want to correct other people?
First of all, you came on a science group and asked some questions. You asked specifically:
"Please post your views and do let me know if I didn't express it
properly."
I answered you, corrected your misconceptions, and posted my views. Now you whine? Shut up crybaby.
You definitely have a crippled view of what Physics is.
No, I understand what physics is. You have a twisted definition of what it is and what it's scope is. Perhaps that is one of the reasons you have made no progress in its study, while I have published papers in the field.
Read some basics (there are books available). Read more. Read about Science.
LOL!
Come now. You are the one who cannot understand the basic fact that answering the "why" is outside the scope of physics, not I.
I have many books on physics and science in general. Perhaps you do as well. I have read and understood mine, have you?
Think more. Or else, you will end up making such stupid comments on others posts.
LOL! Are you regurgitating what others have told you?
Why don't you record what you just said and play it back to yourself each morning. It might help you get into the right mind set.
Gaining nothing. Show your smartness in your own way of thought (I presume you dont have that, or you wont be such jobless).
Jobless?
Wow, where did you pull that from?
A high paying (relatively compared to the average graduate student in physics) fellowship is certainly not being jobless.
What do you do, Mr. photonics?
Are you a dishwasher? A tire mechanic? A computer programmer? Taco bell employee?
I am willing to bet, based on your posts, that you are not a scientist, much less a physicist, and that you have no training in either.
I guess I will have a long time to wait until you can validly "thank" me. *smirk*
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Traveler
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- References:
- physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Mike
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Androcles
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Androcles
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Mike
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Michael Varney
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: Michael Varney
- Re: physical laws and the universe
- From: photonics
- physical laws and the universe
- Prev by Date: Re: in part timelike and in part spacelike
- Next by Date: Re: physical laws and the universe
- Previous by thread: Re: physical laws and the universe
- Next by thread: Re: physical laws and the universe
- Index(es):