Re: Is time dilation real?


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ecdCf.24895$ve.506822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| All rates were correct when measured in their
| respective frames of reference.

They could not have been.
If they actually were,
no different times would be the end result.

| Why can't you
| accept experimental evidence? The answer can
| only be willful ignorance.

There is no experimental evidence that the clocks rate did not change.
you can scream that all you want to,
and if you actually used some logic,
you would know why it would be wrong to conclude
such at all if the end times were not equal.

| Not one. Three. And they all performed as predicted.

blah blah
The clocks have different end times.
and you can not have physical proof the clocks kept the same
physical rates if such an end result occured.
The physical fact is the end result, and that
shows one or more in certain test etc,,
had to change rate physically or it
would have the same time on it, as any other would have.


| Tell me james, if an observer stays with each clock
| and notes that the other clock is running at a different
| rate than his own, and his own is verifiably running
| at its correct designed rate,

Bull***,
The observer could not tell if his clock was running at the
same rate until he returned.
How do you say he did such, and proved it was running the same rate
and not changing rates like what would have to happen
to end up with different end times?


.

Quantcast