Re: Is time dilation real?


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:GGeCf.24963$ve.516527@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rOednUrRLbYD-0TeRVn-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:ecdCf.24895$ve.506822@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | All rates were correct when measured in their
| > | respective frames of reference.
| >
| > They could not have been.
| > If they actually were,
| > no different times would be the end result.
|
| James, they were. That's the reality.

No Greg,
That is missing the reality completely.
The reality is, that if they actually did not change rate at all,
like you say, then the clocks would have the same time
on them when brought together again.
The final result (different times on clocks) follows my postulate
perfectally.
I am amazed you can not grasp this simple logical fact.

It is pretty sad for relativists to actually accept such bull*** to begin
with
without looking atthe logical end result.
different times = clock rate change
It is too simple for you to grasp huh?

Do you actually think that if I accurately pump water out of a tank into
another tank
at the same rate in 2 or more different conditions.
that when they meet again there will be 2 different amounts?



.

Quantcast