Re: Is time dilation real?


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DofCf.24982$ve.523425@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| So you reject the empirical evidence and choose
| to believe that wishing can make the universe
| change its mind.

No, it is you that is rejecting the emperical evidence
that the clocks are not the same times so therefore
the rate of one or more had to have changed at some time.
The end result is emperical proof I am correct.
and you have no emperical proof and can not have emperical
proof that the clocks 'ticked' at the same rates is the end result
states differently.

| No, because you cannot account for all three clocks running
| perfectly (thus requiring no mechanical "fix") and yet
| having them all read different times. You cannot deal
| with this problem by tinkering with the clocks.

To get a true 'timing' for the science of measurement
you should have to do such instead of ignoring such.


| I am amazed that you can reject reality with such
| impunity and not worry about your moral center.

Reality?
the reality is you have conflicting truths.
you have clocks that kept the same rates,
yet you also have clocks that show they had to 'tick'
differently.
You are the one ignoring reality.

| Absolutely, if the relative velocities of the tanks is
| not zero. If you want, we can go through the calculations
| to determine what the difference in amounts would be.

LOL
and you would say that time dilation made the water flow
at the same rates yet come up with different total volumes?
lol
you truly are funny!
lol

| For someone who calls himself a Spaceman, you're not
| going to do very well in space if you can't handle
| simple coordinate transformations.

I know I would not travel in space with the clocks
you think are ticking ok but truly are not.
You are one that should never attempt close to lightspeed travel
in space.. you will end up being a splatter on a planet somewhere
far far away since you would think your time rate changed in reality.
and the planet would not give a crap about your malfunctioning clock.
lol


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is time dilation real?
    ... I have repeatedly said that the clocks did not ... > The end result is emperical proof I am correct. ... to make the universe look the way you want it to, ... rather than accepting the way it does in reality. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Universal Metasymmetry
    ... >> disatances as indicated by real appartus eg rulers and clocks. ... theory can not describe reality' or it is 'only a math contract so can not ... 'Place a particle at rest in an inertial frame. ... where's the input of that instrument and what signal ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GR ?
    ... >>> reality only the relationship between the ladder and door. ... >> And so does SR - which is why proper time is the only invariant time. ... The theory says the flying clocks ... >>> Yes as a physical fact. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is time dilation real?
    ... > That is missing the reality completely. ... > The final result (different times on clocks) follows my postulate ... > It is pretty sad for relativists to actually accept such bullshit to begin ... > Do you actually think that if I accurately pump water out of a tank into ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
    ... |> That is just complete SR bullshit Greg. ... it is the one playing with your clocks and making them ... You deny reality. ...
    (sci.physics)