Re: physical laws and the universe

> Playing with you is getting boring.
> So I think it is time to refrain from discussion with you and place you
> in my kill file.

Crooked way of putting foot in his mouth. Here you go Varney, ashamed.

> LOL! Come on, you can do better than that. Try harder in your insults.

For what?

> You will most likely never be able to understand how science is done,
> its scope and limitations, and its strength. You will never be a
> scientist of any worth and note. Natural selection in action I guess.
> But don't feel too bad, you are a member of the greater majority of the
> human population with regard to understanding science. Feel safe in your
> flock.

Looser's philosophy!

Now I feel I should say that BIG thanks, Varney.

Michael Varney wrote:
> photonics wrote:
> >>No, I understand what physics is
> >
> >
> > That explains everything!
>
> Not really. If fails to explain why you are a crackpot.
>
>
> >> Perhaps that is one of the reasons you
> >>have made no progress in its study, while I have published papers in the
> >>field.
> >
> >
> > Another evidence showing your lack of confidence.
>
> LOL!
>
>
> >>What do you do, Mr. photonics?
> >>Are you a dishwasher? A tire mechanic? A computer programmer? Taco bell
> >>employee?
> >>I am willing to bet, based on your posts, that you are not a scientist,
> >>much less a physicist, and that you have no training in either.
> >
> >
> > Silly prejudice. Look for the definition of crackpot and see how it
> > suits you better.
>
> LOL! Come on, you can do better than that. Try harder in your insults.
> And while you are at it, try and answer the question. Are you a
> scientist? Do you have training in science?
>
> > You may be doing Science, but not fundamental Science.
>
> Actually, I have worked on the must fundamental of science. Gravity.
>
>
> > You can not with
> > a "how".
>
> Again, you are showing your ignorance.
>
>
> >>You have changed the subject.
> >
> >
> > If you are not able to perceive this, Varney how do you manage to do
> > Science (without "why")? You must be the first on a look out for the
> > limits of Science.
>
> And answering the why is one of them.
>
>
> > Remember, "why" is an ever present question mark before Scientists.
>
> Scientists can ask why all they want. And those questions can lead them
> on paths of exploration. But science cannot answer why.
>
> > It's never answered all at once. But every day the answer to that "why"
> > pushes Sciences forward step by step.
> >
> > I guess you end up doing "How". That's also Science, Physics. But
> > another level.
> >
> > You seperated Science from Philosophy. That explains everything again.
>
> Philosophy is not science, so then are separated.
>
> Playing with you is getting boring.
> So I think it is time to refrain from discussion with you and place you
> in my kill file.
>
> You will most likely never be able to understand how science is done,
> its scope and limitations, and its strength. You will never be a
> scientist of any worth and note. Natural selection in action I guess.
> But don't feel too bad, you are a member of the greater majority of the
> human population with regard to understanding science. Feel safe in your
> flock.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... I would think that most scientists have no intention of being dishonest ... science. ... DNA strands. ... parts of the theory of evolution) that can be presented rather easily. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... I would think that most scientists have no intention of being dishonest ... science. ... DNA strands. ... parts of the theory of evolution) that can be presented rather easily. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Why does creationism persist in the USA?
    ... fundementalist churches of the USA and why they support creationism. ... Education, specifially science education, would I expect to be a major ... level scientists and research due to continued funding at the elite ... Whatever "health and vigor" Evolutionism enjoys is also caused by God. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... I would think that most scientists have no intention of being dishonest ... science. ... Because the line between life and non-life is blurred, ... deduction from the evidence is deduction from the evidence - i.e. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: WHICH SCIENCE OR SCIENTISTS CAN YOU TRUST?
    ... Which Science or Scientists Can You Trust? ... convinced they were poisoned; but two Government enquiries ... Industry and British Nuclear Fuels think it is ...
    (sci.chem)