Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:49:18 -0500
"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:r7WdncBfBcD3ykfenZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:s4qCf.25181$ve.573324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | James spells out his difficulty most eloquently in
> | his post above. It is the same problem that beleaguers
> | certain religious zealots, namely they insist on
> | forcing the world to conform to their personal
> | conception of how it should be, as opposed to
> | taking the empirical evidence and building their
> | world model to fit it.
>
> Funny,
> Just like relativity when 2 supposed truths conflict.
> relativity = religion
Accepting empirical evidence and altering the model to
match = Science
Denying the empirical evidence and steadfastly holding
to preconceived ideas = Religion
You are truly a devout man, James.
>
>
> | Note that James worries about accepting conflicting truths
> | as facts, rather than accepting facts as truths. The
> | conflict only arises because of the model he insists on
> | using, and like the typical blinkered True Believer,
> | chooses to deny the facts rather than accept the
> | facts and change his model.
>
> I am using the end result of the same dang model you are using
> Greg.
> There are no 2 models.
> there is only the one and I have found a conflict in the end results.
My model embraces relativity, James. Yours does not.
We are not using the same model.
>
> | It's like the Flat-Earther who cannot conceive of how
> | someone could report that they have travelled directly
> | eastwards in a path that has taken them around the globe
> | ending up back where they started. His model of the
> | world cannot accommodate the two facts as obtaining
> | simultaneously.
>
> 2 facts that conflict are only able to be though both true
> by rubber ruler worshippers.
> You truly are worshipping such conflicting truths.
James = flat-Earther.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Mark Martin
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Mark Martin
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Mark Martin
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- From: Spaceman
- Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- Prev by Date: Re: physical laws and the universe
- Next by Date: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Previous by thread: Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- Next by thread: Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|