Re: Is time dilation real?

"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:2L6dnUL5eqpQLUbeRVn-tA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:CGNCf.26385$ve.733208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | Well, no James. The real joke is that you seem to be
> | pathalogically incapable of correctly restating the
> | facts despite having been told them umpteen times.
>
> You have only told me conflicting bull*** Greg,
> you state the predictions predicted the change,
> yet you also say no change in rate occured in all FoR's
> for the moving clocks.

Hey, I only told you the facts. If you call what the
Universe actually does "bull***", then that's
your problem, right? You're annoyed because you
don't like the way the world works.

>
> |
> | Here. Read this very slowly several times and maybe
> | it'll sink in:
> |
> | (1) The clocks changed rates as measured from different
> | frames of reference.
> | (2) The clocks did not change rates as measured from
> | within their own frames of reference.
>
> Yup, bingo, total conflict.

Only in your model, James. Since that is the way the
universe chooses to work, your model is broken.
Fix your model, James.

> It is amazing you can actually say such things and not
> see the conflict.

Of course I can see the conflict if your model is used
instead of the correct one!


.

Quantcast