Re: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.3: Why Infinite Speed
- From: "Dr. Don Abelian" <spamless@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:28:39 -0600
"OsherD" <mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138608054.419861.307530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> The realization that Knowledge/Semantic Information is the key
> "objective" or even objective function associated with "time travel"
> makes all the difference in choosing between finite and infinite
> speeds.
Not so, just having knowledge does not allow one to go at infinite speeds.
>All the indications that we have agree that Knowledge/Semantic
> Information is not benefitted by a finite speed limitation. In fact,
> propositions both in classical and Fuzzy Multivalued Logics are
> essentially simultaneous concatenations or
Fuzzy logic has nothing to do with speed or semite information.
Please review your notes.
> conjunction/unions/negations/implications of Knowledge with the
> provision that they apply to physics or science or engineering. It
> would only make things harder to understand if one introduced a bigger
> and bigger "delay" into propositions or their parts.
delay is not involved either, how do you get delay from (df/dx)(dg/dx)?
Can you show this? I doubt it.
>
> In a way, this is recognized even by finite light speed advocates who
> realize that a light ray "sees its entire past and future
> simultaneously", as the expression usually goes.
wrong again, you are having an off day aren't you?
>But they tend to
> ignore the intuition provided by this statement.
>
> The Universe accelerates arguably "for Knowledge",
so gravity is due to high school ?
>and that explains
> why the acceleration/velocity is superluminal as in inflation.
velocity is not acceleration.
superluminal is not inflation.
you defiantly have problem separating concepts
they are getting all glommed together, like mad cow disease.
>Both
> inflation and the PI Knowledge theory support each other here.
>
a poor concept, but you need the feedback before you get too far out into
left field.
A good Learning Lesson for you.
> Osher Doctorow
>
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Conflicting truths in time dilation aka time dilation debunking 101..
- Next by Date: Re: "The Arrow of Time"
- Previous by thread: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 19.3: Why Infinite Speed
- Next by thread: Color darker when wet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
