Re: Signal/Noise Ratio
- From: "Mot Datrix" <spamless@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:34:08 -0600
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138648300.377677.292690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jan 30, 06
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/about
>
> Noise = 795+545+223+202
> Sig = 354+303+261+249
> Null=205+192
>
> S/N = .66
>
> Ken S. Tucker
>
That is -1.8 dB
But I think it is far worse than that.
estimated S/N = 0.001 or -30 dB
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Signal/Noise Ratio
- From: Mot Datrix
- Re: Signal/Noise Ratio
- References:
- Signal/Noise Ratio
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Signal/Noise Ratio
- Prev by Date: Re: Does Mandelbrot/Julia duality reflect relativity/quantum duality?
- Next by Date: Re: Signal/Noise Ratio
- Previous by thread: Signal/Noise Ratio
- Next by thread: Re: Signal/Noise Ratio
- Index(es):
