sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Properties of Magnetic Materials
  • From: Lester Lapsus
• Re: Physics of Pool (Billiards)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics of Pool (Billiards)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Physics of Pool (Billiards)
  • From: Mastadex
• Re: differential equations for the proton, neutron and electron relationship
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: amerwe
• Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 767 February 28, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Blocked sender list for sci.physics ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Father of ISS Publishes Structure of the Atomic Nucleus
  • From: Millennium
• X -> LOG|X|
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: amerwe
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: SCW
• Re: wow that's the best solution ever -- regarding dedanoe's SPONGE
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Blocked sender list for sci.physics ?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Blocked sender list for sci.physics ?
  • From: Chumly HT
• Re: wow that's the best solution ever -- regarding dedanoe's SPONGE
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: SCW
• Re: Conservation of momentum -specific case
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of momentum -specific case
  • From: Wiredchop
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: SCW
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Conservation of momentum -specific case
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Erops
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: Traveler
• Absolute/relative space as opposed to Copernican heliocentricity
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: SCW
• wow that's the best solution ever -- regarding dedanoe's SPONGE
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: srp
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: SCW
• Re: A theory of everything that _Matters_.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: A theory of everything that _Matters_.
  • From: T Wake
• Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
  • From: alextangent
• Conservation of momentum -specific case
  • From: Wiredchop
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: SCW
• Re: Least square fitting
  • From: tadchem
• Re: A theory of everything that _Matters_.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: amerwe
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: amerwe
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: amerwe
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: amerwe
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum entanglement
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 3: Linked Logistic Probable Influence Is Non-Decreasing in Time
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum entanglement
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 3: Linked Logistic Probable Influence Is Non-Decreasing in Time
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum entanglement
  • From: Greysky
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 3: Linked Logistic Probable Influence Is Non-Decreasing in Time
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 2: Quantum/Macroscopic Erasure
  • From: OsherD
• Least square fitting
  • From: carlos . james . r
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 2: Quantum/Macroscopic Erasure
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 2: Quantum/Macroscopic Erasure
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum entanglement
  • From: mike3
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals
  • From: OsherD
• Re: silly particle question? BUSTED
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: silly particle question?
  • From: RP
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???BUSTED
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals
  • From: Jahulamed
• Re: Some Simple Optical Questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: silly particle question?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 27 February 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A theory of everything that _Matters_.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: silly particle question?
  • From: RP
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Some Simple Optical Questions
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• silly particle question?
  • From: Neil W
• Re: Some Simple Optical Questions
  • From: Zulayman
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: hanson
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: BD
• Re: Some Simple Optical Questions
  • From: BD
• Re: Where do the sane post?
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Some Simple Optical Questions
  • From: John Popelish
• Where do the sane post?
  • From: alextangent
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals
  • From: OsherD
• Some Simple Optical Questions
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tobacco smokers are the soberest people I know.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals
  • From: OsherD
• Tobacco smokers are the soberest people I know.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Interesting physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHY IS THIS CONSTANT IN MKSA SO CLOSE TO ONE?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Interesting physics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???BUSTED
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., Send someone by for a piss test or whatever.
  • From: T Wake
• Interesting physics
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: WHY IS THIS CONSTANT IN MKSA SO CLOSE TO ONE?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• T.J., Send someone by for a piss test or whatever.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: WHY IS THIS CONSTANT IN MKSA SO CLOSE TO ONE?
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• WHY IS THIS CONSTANT IN MKSA SO CLOSE TO ONE?
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: PD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Don1, Spaceman, OsherD, DJM, Turcard, Traveller et al.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Don1, Spaceman, OsherD, DJM, Turcard, Traveller et al.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???BUSTED
  • From: tj Frazir
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Erops
• Re: Don1, Spaceman, OsherD, DJM, Turcard, Traveller et al.
  • From: T Wake
• Don1, Spaceman, OsherD, DJM, Turcard, Traveller et al.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: T Wake
• I love Sir John-Paul Turcaud
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Solar Cell Cooling?
  • From: Alexander Thesoso
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, February 27, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• what is state of inner balance?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Chris
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: T.J., you see wild things that simply aren't there.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Unlike Mark_Martin, I actually have something to say.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: platopes
• OT The Art
  • From: julianlzb87
• Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 4: Exponentials in and out of Cosmology
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: hanson
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: hanson
• Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 3: Linked Logistic System and Exponential Subcases
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T.J., you sound _Exactly_ like one of those Nigerian scammers.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., you sound _Exactly_ like one of those Nigerian scammers.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Galaxy Energy Theory~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: electrolysis
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tdp1001
• All Is Revealed to Electrodynamic Blue Star, Global Consciousness
  • From: yonibluestar
• Re: electrolysis
  • From: Pipi
• Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 3: Linked Logistic System and Exponential Subcases
  • From: Pipi
• Unlike Mark_Martin, I actually have something to say.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: Edward Green
• T.J., you sound _Exactly_ like one of those Nigerian scammers.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: electrolysis
  • From: cnctut
• Re: electrolysis
  • From: cnctut
• Re: T.J., you see wild things that simply aren't there.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• electrolysis
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: tdp1001
• Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 3: Linked Logistic System and Exponential Subcases
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T_Wake is _Not_ sober.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Everything is already determined, that's a _Hard_ fact.
  • From: T Wake
• T_Wake is _Not_ sober.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Galaxy Energy Theory~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No_Where in nature is there a perfect vacuum or infinite density.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Everything is already determined, that's a _Hard_ fact.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: shoemakerted@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: No_Where in nature is there a perfect vacuum or infinite density.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: Tony
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: OG
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: penseur
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Solar Cell Cooling?
  • From: Alexander Thesoso
• Galaxy Energy Theory~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  • From: granite stone
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: Chris
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tadchem
• Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: RP
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: Sir Frederick
• Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: RP
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: RP
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: Sir Frederick
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: Darkwing
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A New Style Nuclear Trigger
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein smoked tobacco. No one is more sober than a tobacco smoker.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: matt271829-news
• Einstein smoked tobacco. No one is more sober than a tobacco smoker.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• A silly problem with the constant speed of light.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: hanson
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Igor
• Re: No_Where in nature is there a perfect vacuum or infinite density.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Igor
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: Sir Frederick
• Re: Some Asians have certain prejudices.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., you see wild things that simply aren't there.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: thermal photons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• No_Where in nature is there a perfect vacuum or infinite density.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: A New Style Nuclear Trigger
  • From: handoffsid
• Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?
  • From: donstockbauer
• thermal photons
  • From: Sir Frederick
• T.J., you see wild things that simply aren't there.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?
  • From: handoffsid
• I won't put myself in the hands of someone with such a wild imagination.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Some Asians have certain prejudices.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: GENERALIZATION OF MAXWELL's EQUATIONS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD!!!!!!!!!
  • From: srp
• Re: Hawking said the future was set in stone.
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: finding the particle
  • From: srp
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Etis
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: finding the particle
  • From: Peter
• Re: Some Asians have certain prejudices.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The future is every bit as determined as the past.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Peter
• Re: size of universe question
  • From: Dr Nanduri
• Re: Article: On Cosmic Magnetic Fields
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: andrewvecsey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Article: On Cosmic Magnetic Fields
  • From: ma1ibu
• What is a "nuclear flame"?
  • From: Radium
• Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Hawking said the future was set in stone.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation 2: Don't Delete Incoming Data From Infinity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tdp1001
• Earth shattering article unifying the four forces has been updated!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Hawking said the future was set in stone.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• do you want some information on your online studies?
  • From: gastrofil
• Re: Some Asians have certain prejudices.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Hawking said the future was set in stone.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The house _Always_ wins in the long run.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• The house _Always_ wins in the long run.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: The future is every bit as determined as the past.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• The future is every bit as determined as the past.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic.
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Cross-Logistic Generalized Equation
  • From: OsherD
• T_Wake, you aren't prepared for life or death.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: matt271829-news
• Moleculer Interactions?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Like evolution, Space_Time_Entropy is a mature topic.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual
  • From: donstockbauer
• Some Asians have certain prejudices.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tadchem
• Re: T_Wake, GR is simple, you just can't handle it.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual
  • From: OsherD
• T_Wake, GR is simple, you just can't handle it.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A New Style Nuclear Trigger
  • From: tj Frazir
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 18: HUP is at most Perceptual
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: I think they could use me in Beijing to clean up the code.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: I think they could use me in Beijing to clean up the code.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T_Wake, You'll know I'm right when you start losing.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 17: Partial Circle Paradox
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• T_Wake, You'll know I'm right when you start losing.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Mike
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Question for Ken Seto
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: condensator
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: T_Wake lives in la la land.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• T_Wake lives in la la land.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• how profound dedanoe!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How can you pilot a ship when all you see is phantom objects ? !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• How can you pilot a ship when all you see is phantom objects ? !
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: The www. prefix.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: NASA Specialized Center of Research and Training, NSCORT, in Exobiology.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The www. prefix.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Important Paper for Anti-Relativityists
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• NASA Specialized Center of Research and Training, NSCORT, in Exobiology.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Greg Neill
• finding the particle
  • From: photonics
• abort, retry, ignore, fail?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The www. prefix.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The shape of Space_Time_Entropy, not space.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Peter
• condensator
  • From: Chrisd5000rouge
• The www. prefix.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Everything has just always been, and will continue to be, dissipating.
  • From: T Wake
• The shape of Space_Time_Entropy, not space.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 16: Power Laws vs sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Is the Pope a Catholic?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 16: Power Laws vs sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Instantaneous acceleration
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 16: Power Laws vs sqrt(1 - v^2/c^2)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Instantaneous acceleration
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A New Style Nuclear Trigger
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: hanson
• Re: physics 2000
  • From: Mike H.
• Re: physics 2000
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Question for Ken Seto
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: physics 2000
  • From: Mike H.
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• A New Style Nuclear Trigger
  • From: handoffsid
• Re: Easy Answers: Quantum computer gives results without running
  • From: handoffsid
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: matt271829-news
• "Gravity"
  • From: Etis
• Is the Pope a Catholic?
  • From: Dougal McDougal of that Elk
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: physics 2000
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: CWatters
• Re: I have connections up the yang, both legal and otherwise.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: SCW
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Superposed vs Superimposed
  • From: platopes
• Re: The Pit of Hell
  • From: platopes
• Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 15: Holographic Principle
  • From: OsherD
• physics 2000
  • From: Mike H.
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 15: Holographic Principle
  • From: OsherD
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 15: Holographic Principle
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes
  • From: OsherD
• Standard Model electron orbitals vs Smart Model no electron orbitals
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: The Pit of Hell
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Superposed vs Superimposed
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Greg Neill
• Easy Answers: Quantum computer gives results without running
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Entropy of a ng thread
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Entropy of a ng thread
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Fuel junkies.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Entropy of a ng thread
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Entropy of a ng thread
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Entropy of a ng thread
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: In this sad game of life we're playing, everyone loses in the end.
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Everything has just always been, and will continue to be, dissipating.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: I have connections up the yang, both legal and otherwise.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Physics of aerial skiing tricks
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: Wouter van Marle
• Re: In this sad game of life we're playing, everyone loses in the end.
  • From: T Wake
• In this sad game of life we're playing, everyone loses in the end.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: USB Live System Requirements
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Entropy of a ng thread
  • From: SCW
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: THE USA AWARE OF THE HUGE DEEP SEA GOLD PLACERS SINCE OVER 50Y...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson - Morley experiment
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Re: USB Live System Requirements
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Feb 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: radio control of remote devices from pc
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: kenseto
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Igor
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: SCW
• Michelson - Morley experiment
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: THE USA AWARE OF THE HUGE DEEP SEA GOLD PLACERS SINCE OVER 50 Y...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: THE USA AWARE OF THE HUGE DEEP SEA GOLD PLACERS SINCE OVER 50 Y...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Physicists learn how to "teleclone"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: srp
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: SCW
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Entanglement heats up
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: hanson
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Physicists learn how to "teleclone"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: the "forces" behind light?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes
  • From: Caught You
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes
  • From: Caught You
• the "forces" behind light?
  • From: shoemakerted@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nietzsche's failed attempt to find God and meaning in life.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: From effectively no entropy to effectively infinite dissipation.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: briggs
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Etis
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Entanglement heats up
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hearing
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: radio control of remote devices from pc
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Hearing
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: USB Live System Requirements
  • From: CWatters
• Hearing
  • From: Anis
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: penseur
• Re: Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: penseur
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: penseur
• Re: Newton alternative?
  • From: joe_avery_2005
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: Doune
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes
  • From: OsherD
• Invitation To Goldlynks Club And Enrich Yourself @ www.cashcards.net/rep/76574
  • From: wilson_20004
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 14: Universal Constant Paradoxes
  • From: OsherD
• And Then If I Have Some Beans, I Post That To Sci.Physics, Too
  • From: platopes
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: GOLD SCARCITY
  • From: platopes
• Re: Entanglement heats up
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Entanglement heats up
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: RP
• Triangulation of Broadcast Signal
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Edward Green
• radio control of remote devices from pc
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Entanglement heats up
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question for OG
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Question for OG
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: USB Live System Requirements
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: New Electricity
  • From: Doune
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: PD
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: PD
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: srp
• Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis
  • From: Dr.Chumly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• From effectively no entropy to effectively infinite dissipation.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy.
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Methane animated or why galaxies in clusters are segregated into two planes.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: Doune
• Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: Doune
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: question about atoms
  • From: srp
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• question about atoms
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: PD
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• New Electricity
  • From: Chris
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Structure of God's Mind
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: The Structure of God's Mind
  • From: science
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Structure of God's Mind
  • From: science
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Doppler Space Time Mind of God
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Igor
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: thoovler
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Nietzsche's failed attempt to find God and meaning in life.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics
  • From: Dianelos Georgoudis
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why INDEED Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? -- 911 Conspiracy.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: went for job interview
  • From: tj Frazir
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Etis
• Re: Scientists Bewildered By Fine Tuned Design Of The Universe
  • From: PD
• Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar.....
  • From: Tony
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: PD
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar.....
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!
  • From: Doune
• Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar.....
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar.....
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!
  • From: CWatters
• Re: USB Live System Requirements
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Tony
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• the new looks of dedanoe's nukebook
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Doune
• Re: USB Live System Requirements
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!
  • From: Doune
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• How come the wavelength of photons can change if time does not exist for them?
  • From: playa7383
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Life inside the case of a fragile guitar.....
  • From: Dr Physics
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: wavelength detector moving towards lightsource
  • From: Dr Physics
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: wavelength detector moving towards lightsource
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: went for job interview
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• USB Live System Requirements
  • From: mwmiller314
• Conflict instigation, "Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Definition of moment of inertia wrong?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!
  • From: Useful
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• wavelength detector moving towards lightsource
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Continuous Creation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: young's double slit
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Liberals are a Republican's best friend
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Scientists Bewildered By Fine Tuned Design Of The Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Gee, how PROFOUND!!!!
  • From: rander3127
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: young's double slit
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: GeordieSi
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: young's double slit
  • From: PD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Tony
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: young's double slit
  • From: (-Peter-)
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: PD
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: young's double slit
  • From: OG
• Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• young's double slit
  • From: (-Peter-)
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Igor
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: T Wake
• Simple question for Spaceman
  • From: OG
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: PD
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Problems in DH Perkins "Introduction to High Energy Physics"
  • From: Tine
• Re: Causation/Causality-OsherD, DECODED!!
  • From: Dr Physics
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: I'm God's prisoner, and God to my prisoners.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Causation/Causality-OsherD, DECODED!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: physics
  • From: science
• Re: I'm God's prisoner, and God to my prisoners.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Causation/Causality-OsherD, DECODED!!
  • From: Doctor Physics
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 12: Constant Causation vs Constant Light
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The Structure of God's Mind
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I'm God's prisoner, and God to my prisoners.
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Etis
• dedanoe's SPONGE
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Plastic Light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Interactive Google Map for the Solar Eclipse (March 29 2006)
  • From: xjubier
• Plastic Light
  • From: Doune
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: uckermann ratio
  • From: uzman
• Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby"
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tadchem
• Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: lgardner
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: oriel36
• Methane animation build complete-soon available.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby"
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 11: Heisenberg and Superluminal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 11: Heisenberg and Superluminal
  • From: donstockbauer
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 11: Heisenberg and Superluminal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Relastic
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: PD
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Relastic
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mortal fools
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby"
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Free Energy
  • From: cnctut
• Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby"
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Mortal fools
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Mozart
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mortal fools
  • From: OG
• Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby"
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A Simply Basic Summary Of The Smart Model Theory Using Speaking "Robby"
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Mortal fools
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: listerofsmeg01
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: penseur
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: listerofsmeg01
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: listerofsmeg01
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: listerofsmeg01
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Sulayman
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: Sulayman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Europe to start EIT as their own MIT
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: listerofsmeg01
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Sulayman
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Randy Poe
• Stupid questions about EMR
  • From: listerofsmeg01
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: compressed air receiver flow
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Drug abuse is the issue. Petroleum abuse, food abuse... not use.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: compressed air receiver flow
  • From: technical123
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Igor
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The train and the light inside.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: donstockbauer
• The train and the light inside.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: compressed air receiver flow
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Superposed vs Superimposed
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics
  • From: Dianelos Georgoudis
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Etis
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• compressed air receiver flow
  • From: technical123
• Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics
  • From: Dianelos Georgoudis
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Article unifies the four forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 766 February 21, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Article unifies the four forces
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Peter
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How Does This Work?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Newton alternative?
  • From: amerwe
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: How Does This Work?
  • From: Hakk
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Bob Cain
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 10: Dependence Kernel Measures
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How Does This Work?
  • From: Doune
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Drug abuse is the issue. Petroleum abuse, food abuse... not use.
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 10: Dependence Kernel Measures
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Historic Moment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: OG
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Continuous Creation
  • From: Bill Baka
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How Does This Work?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: How Does This Work?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: How Does This Work?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: asdf
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• How Does This Work?
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Call for Papers - The Journal of American Science
  • From: science
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Acquiring and maintaining a place of her own.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Simple question about a laser pushing a proton.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: jcon
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: uckermann ratio
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: uckermann ratio
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Deep burn transmutation
  • From: Giuseppe
• Re: *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: physics
  • From: uzman
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 9: Tensors Only Approximate Causation
  • From: OsherD
• physics
  • From: science
• uckermann ratio
  • From: uzman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Aetherist
• *Good* pop-physics books?
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: FAX
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Etis
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: FAX
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Deep burn transmutation
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Deep burn transmutation
  • From: Giuseppe
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: GeordieSi
• Please give us your opinion about this debate on quantum mechanics
  • From: Dianelos Georgoudis
• Re: The mass of a photon
  • From: Doune
• Re: The mass of a photon
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: planck's numbers
  • From: Doune
• Re: The mass of a photon
  • From: Doune
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, February 20, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !
  • From: Doune
• Re: Dependent Losing Games May Add Up to a Win
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dependent Losing Games May Add Up to a Win
  • From: OsherD
• Dependent Losing Games May Add Up to a Win
  • From: OsherD
• Anisotropic Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Funny Spoof
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Quantum Theory Paradox: The Mean of a Finite Variable Can Be Infinite
  • From: Sulayman
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 8: Dependence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 8: Dependence
  • From: OsherD
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 8: Dependence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Funny Spoof
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Funny Spoof
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Theory Paradox: The Mean of a Finite Variable Can Be Infinite
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Quantum Theory Paradox: The Mean of a Finite Variable Can Be Infinite
  • From: Sulayman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Whats going on??? Who ARE you people??? !
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Life in the Cosmos
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Theory Paradox: The Mean of a Finite Variable Can Be Infinite
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 7: Sums of Variables and Anti-Multiplication
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 6: New Interpretation of Riccati Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Life in the Cosmos
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Funny Spoof
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The mass of a photon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• RE: The mass of a photon
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Continuous Creation
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• loop quantum gravity
  • From: brad
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flexi-gravity: It bends, it twists, it dances a jig!
  • From: hanson
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Life in the Cosmos
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• planck's numbers
  • From: brad
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Special relativity and velocity for given total energy
  • From: srp
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Flexi-gravity: It bends, it twists, it dances a jig!
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Photons having mass
  • From: hanson
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: T Wake
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 5.1 Intersection as Multiplication
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 5: Anti-Multiplication and Schwinger
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Continuous Creation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 5: Anti-Multiplication and Schwinger
  • From: OsherD
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Emoh
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 5: Anti-Multiplication and Schwinger
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Life in the Cosmos
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• sponging method - dedanoe's di/pro-gressive error maker based on his imbalance thesis
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Life in the Cosmos
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 4: Memory vs Complexity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Life in the Cosmos
  • From: Teslia
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Life in the Cosmos
  • From: boson boss
• Re: SOLUTION TO CANE TOAD
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Easy thermochemistry question!
  • From: Doune
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Greek Alphabet
  • From: Anon
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Discussion on the Basic Properties of an Aether
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Life in the Cosmos
  • From: rev.goetz
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Special relativity and velocity for given total energy
  • From: Max
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A Discussion on the Basic Properties of an Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Greek Alphabet
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Greek Alphabet
  • From: Anon
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Flying around in a circle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?
  • From: pixel_a_ted
• Flying around in a circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• tunneling half time
  • From: sigoldberg1
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Update on Methane molecule animation.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 3: Integral Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Michael Ejercito
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 3: Integral Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 3: Integral Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2.1: I[f(x)delta(x-y)]dx = f(y)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2.1: I[f(x)delta(x-y)]dx = f(y)
  • From: OsherD
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2.1: I[f(x)delta(x-y)]dx = f(y)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: the armagedon begins now
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2: t2 - t1 or t - t1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 2: t2 - t1 or t - t1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: $9,700 Sedan?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: the armagedon begins now
  • From: tadchem
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Emoh
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? !Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: the armagedon begins now
  • From: Torchy
• Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Physicists look at birdsong
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution
  • From: OsherD
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Calculating Dogs
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !
  • From: donstockbauer
• Calculating Dogs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physicists look at birdsong
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 February 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! Idareyou!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Doune
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Thermo 2
  • From: Doune
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! Idareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Feb 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: asdf
• Re: Real Time
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: asdf
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Predictability and Energy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! Idareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?
  • From: science
• Re: Predictability and Energy
  • From: PD
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Emoh
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Unit-43
• Re: Relativity for the Masses
  • From: donstockbauer
• Relativity for the Masses
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?
  • From: newedana
• data compression and expansion: SPONGE method by dedanoe
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Predictability and Energy
  • From: Physitrex
• Real Time
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Predictability and Energy
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Wattage produced by x gm. radium
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Wattage produced by x gm. radium
  • From: Protoman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Anders
• Re: Wattage produced by x gm. radium
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: PD
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Protoman
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: PD
• Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: PD
• Re: size of universe question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: size of universe question
  • From: PD
• Re: size of universe question
  • From: PD
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: John
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: John
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: John
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dareyou !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating.
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Heat_death.
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?
  • From: pixel_a_ted
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: size of universe question
  • From: Relastic
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: xichimos
• Re: size of universe question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• size of universe question
  • From: Steve Pope
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Wattage produced by x gm. radium
  • From: Protoman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Protoman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• Re: Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dareyou !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: xichimos
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: xichimos
• Re: There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: tj Frazir
• Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Protoman
• Building a Laser Weapon
  • From: Protoman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Unit-43
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dare you !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: tj Frazir
• There is no middle density, the universe has just always been dissipating.
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: I pay and pay and get little in return.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Like the universe itself, black holes dissipate.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
  • From: OG
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: John
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: John
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: John
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: John
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dare you !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: PD
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dare you !
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: How to search, how to find?
  • From: moa
• T_Wake, Name one thing that wins in the long run ? ! I dare you !
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: How to search, how to find?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: My scoring, editing, searching and posting systems...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: T Wake
• My scoring, editing, searching and posting systems...
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: ChrisV's crappy scoring and endless one word posts.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to search, how to find?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: T_Wake, madly deluded.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: PD
• Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: xichimos
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: xichimos
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: uri
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Predictability and Energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence
  • From: vanep
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Predictability and Energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Emoh
• Re: Predictability and Energy
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: PD
• Measuring Photovoltaic cells' Efficiency
  • From: MatGilson
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: PD
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• T_Wake, madly deluded.
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Re: The Spaceman Emulator
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: PROOF THAT THERE ARE AN INFINITY OF PRIMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• PROOF THAT THERE ARE AN INFINITY OF PRIMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: Time is actually parochial and static.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Julian Schwinger (Nobel Laureate) and Causality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: Easy thermochemistry question!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Predictability and Energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Predictability and Energy
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Easy thermochemistry question!
  • From: Colin
• Re: Easy thermochemistry question!
  • From: RP
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: xichimos
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 3: Correction
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 3: Correction
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Centre of mass theorem for rotaing bodies?
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 2: Why the Reversal
  • From: OsherD
• Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence 2: Why the Reversal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Universe and motion
  • From: Orion
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Universe and motion
  • From: Orion
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Easy thermochemistry question
  • From: Colin
• Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Kronecker Delta, Delta Function, Green's Function, Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: My formal _Answer_ to the eviction summons I was served yesterday.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Time is actually parochial and static.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Mathematical model of inertia
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Time is actually parochial and static.
  • From: Jeff_℞elf
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: It's tit for tat...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: It's tit for tat...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Unit conversion, what a nightmare
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: PD
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: PD
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: JMA
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: PD
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• the armagedon begins now
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: drelliot
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Very OT Now (was: Re: Open letter to "John Smith")
  • From: T Wake
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Orion
• Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: Orion
• Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Orion
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Relastic
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Relastic
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Orion
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Relastic
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: oriel36
• Re: What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Orion
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• What really is Time, seriously?
  • From: Relastic
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Orion
• Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Nanotubes break superconducting record
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: 100 000 TONS OF GOLD AT THE FOOT OF CHINA !
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence
  • From: vanep
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Nanotubes break superconducting record
  • From: donstockbauer
• Nanotubes break superconducting record
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Generation of Large Electrostatic field
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• [ANN] SDX Dynamic Systems Simulation Software
  • From: Tim Silva
• Re: Planck length calculated assuming D>3 dimensions - would it be larger?
  • From: stargene
• NASER
  • From: buttersniff
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: The speed of light revisited
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• The speed of light revisited
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: Unit conversion, what a nightmare
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• EMF generated from a nearby communication satellite dish
  • From: bchorng
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: dedanoe
• the first equation in general physics 2 that i have is incorrect
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
  • From: OG
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity")
  • From: PD
• Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: building a small-college cluster for computational physics
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Description of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• building a small-college cluster for computational physics
  • From: nt moore
• Description of the Universe
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 765 February14, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• The General Science Journal
  • From: avergon
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Ark of the covenant, a nuclear battery?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Ark of the covenant, a nuclear battery?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Fairy Tale Physics: Myths and Legends Explained
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Unit conversion, what a nightmare
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: LASER DOCUMENTARY
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Emoh
• Correlation: Cosmic Ray X-rays and Lightning Strikes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Fairy Tale Physics: Myths and Legends Explained
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away
  • From: T Wake
• Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Energy Mass Conversion
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: George Green and Causality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: George Green and Causality
  • From: OsherD
• George Green and Causality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• ODSummery #2
  • From: Seller
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Open letter to "John Smith"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: bicycle question - real life event
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ark of the covenant, a nuclear battery?- a holy weapon against global fundamentalism
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Experts Conclude "Official" 9-11 Story Is A Hoax
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• energy needed to magnetise
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Looking for arXiv endorsement
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Causality: Green's Function in GR, QM, QFT, etc., and Probable influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Creighton Hogg
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Creighton Hogg
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help with mechanics problem
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: bicycle question - real life event
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: proving Kepler Packing and 4 Color Mapping using the same technique of Smallest Member
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Creighton Hogg
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Let's cut our lawns relatively
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• New Article on GA and Schrödinger
  • From: R.Aparicio
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Creighton Hogg
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Caroline Thompson Passed Away
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity of gaseous planets
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Doune
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Emoh
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Thermodynamics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: JMA
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Universe Opposed In Triplicate
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Nuclear spin
  • From: sebire
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• 1BluePlanet .com Worldwide Great Things
  • From: 1blueplanet.com
• Re: OD Summery #1
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Questions about Size of Atoms?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Time having four dimensions
  • From: Anders
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, February 13, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Causation: Light Cone Causality vs Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation: Light Cone Causality vs Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Causation: Light Cone Causality vs Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Unit conversion, what a nightmare
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The Tau Lepton -- Disproving Newtonian Energy Calculations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Time having four dimensions
  • From: Anders
• Unit conversion, what a nightmare
  • From: Angel
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: serious question on Australian scientists
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: tdp1001
• LASER DOCUMENTARY
  • From: Larry
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: brad
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: OG
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: OG
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: String theory, double slit experiment
  • From: RP
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: OG
• Doppler effect on the speed of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Energy Mass Conversion
  • From: Borne
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Ark of the covenant, a nuclear battery?- a holy weapon against global fundamentalism
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Energy Mass Conversion
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Sliding and rolling
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity")
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity")
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Simple Proof Of The Existence Of God
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
  • From: OG
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: PD
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Endless dialectic
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Endless dialectic
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Endless dialectic
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Endless dialectic
  • From: Jim Black
• tj Frazir's Aircraft carrier
  • From: hanson
• Re: Endless dialectic
  • From: Spaceman
• Endless dialectic
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: String theory, double slit experiment
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: The Simple Proof Of The Existence Of God
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Ecuas
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: GET RID OF ALL GOLD SHARES WHILE YOU CAN
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity")
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Sliding and rolling
  • From: Nothx
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Balloon Question
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: autonomic perpetuum mobile transformer by dedanoe
  • From: dedanoe
• autonomic perpetuum mobile transformer by dedanoe
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: String theory, double slit experiment
  • From: Greysky
• Re: checking weight on a moving belt
  • From: Marcel
• Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy.
  • From: Zebsky
• Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Every Carbon atom is a galaxy.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Balloon Question
  • From: learningmagic
• Re: Rating System on sci.physics Should Be Interpreted in Reverse
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity")
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: OD Summery #1
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Every Carbon atom is a galaxy.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: String theory, double slit experiment
  • From: RP
• Re: The Spaceman Emulator
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• The Spaceman Emulator
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: bicycle question - real life event
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: REED AND WEEP -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design
  • From: jgreimer
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: bicycle question - real life event
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity")
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Rating System on sci.physics Should Be Interpreted in Reverse
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: bicycle question - real life event
  • From: Andy Gee
• Re: Rating System on sci.physics Should Be Interpreted in Reverse
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Spaceman
• Rating System on sci.physics Should Be Interpreted in Reverse
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Spaceman
• OD Summery #1
  • From: Sulayman
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 5: Alternating Series
  • From: OsherD
• Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 5: Alternating Series
  • From: OsherD
• Re: If so, then proof it!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: The Simple Proof Of The Existence Of God
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• The Simple Proof Of The Existence Of God
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Milky Way and Andromeda clusters in two planes prove Galaxy Model for the Atom is correct.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: JMA
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread.
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: REED AND WEEP -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design
  • From: tadchem
• Re: UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Mental Abuse
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some astronomical "force" constant questions
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Milky Way and Andromeda clusters in two planes prove Galaxy Model for the Atom is correct.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Milky Way and Andromeda clusters in two planes prove Galaxy Model for the Atom is correct.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Milky Way and Andromeda clusters in two planes prove Galaxy Model for the Atom is correct.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 4: Elliptic Curves
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• UPPER-BOUND FOR THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS IN CHESS!!!!!
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: REED AND WEEP -- Evolution vs. Intelligent Design
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Better scientists can see it... it's a very adult topic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 3: Conditional Probability vs Scheme
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: proving Kepler Packing and 4 Color Mapping using the same technique of Smallest Member
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 3: Conditional Probability vs Scheme
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Spaceman
• Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 3: Conditional Probability vs Scheme
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Spinning cube question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: bicycle question - real life event
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• GTR gets a new life!!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Borne
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A Category is Only Allowed Once in Physic's Physical Theory
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Ecuas
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: quesetino(?) about ion 'beams'
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Google usenet post rating system
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Feb 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
  • From: OG
• Re: bicycle question - real life event
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Gravitational Field
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lighter Cars Not Necessarily Riskier, Physicists Say
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is it our math letting us down?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The can rolling on the traincar. yet another gedanken fun thread.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme
  • From: OsherD
• Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology 2: PI vs Scheme
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Probable Influence/Causation Versus Algebraic Geometry/Topology
  • From: OsherD