Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: "bernardz" <bernardz@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Feb 2006 17:23:59 -0800
Spaceman wrote:
"BernardZ" <bernardZ@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e4cbb96b3454fc798986a@xxxxxxx
| In article <1138849820.849400.310090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
| Carboni.R@xxxxxxxxx says...
| The photon experiences no time at all. That is why it can travel the
| universe with no decay.
If it can not experience "time" as stated.
It can not have momentum.
:)
Time does not require momentum.
Say two observers are on balls that travelling in parallel at the same
speed in space. If they did tests on each other it would show *no*
momentum yet they would experience time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- References:
- Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: Carboni . R
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: Spaceman
- Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum measurements and consciousness
- Next by Date: Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- Previous by thread: Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- Next by thread: Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|