Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:00:09 -0500
"bernardz" <bernardz@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1138938655.020239.294940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Say a box existed with perfect mirrors on each side. Inside two beams
| of light are going back and forwards so when one hits one side the
| other beam hits the other side. There is no momentum in the box.
The photons themselves have momentum
(it is the only way the silly time travel physicists can say it has no mass)
:)
| Yet you could count how many times the beam of light hits one wall. It
| is a clock but it has no momentum.
photons have momentum.
They can not impart energy without such.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: donstockbauer
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- References:
- Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: Carboni . R
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: bernardz
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- From: bernardz
- Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- Prev by Date: Re: Fighting AIDS -- knowing heals knowing kills
- Next by Date: Derivative Products of Form (df/dx)(dg/dx) in Physics 25: A Paradox in Special Relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- Next by thread: Re: Time From Light's Frame of Reference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|