Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.

Space*** wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fW%Ef.753945$_o.123268@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| Space*** wrote:
| > I already know the SR "fix" and I even know
| > the reason they had to do such so the theory could actually
| > make some sense at all.
| >
|
| Space***... you say that you know that SR makes sense? I should
| hope so, as there has never been a prediction of special relativity
| that was contradicted by an observation.

Sam,
I have not stated SR makes sense in finding causes though.
It actually does not find physical cause for anything.
It merely predicts stuff and it will have problems if anything
that moves close to light speed comes upon things
that are not moving close to light speed.

SR if continued to be worshipped when humans get into
space at high speeds will only cause the same type
problems that trains had with clock malfunctions long ago.



What people find compelling about SR is that observation agree
with its predictions and that it is a valuable too in exploring
many phenomena in the universe and that it is important in some
engineering projects.
.

Loading