Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.


"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EEcFf.754952$_o.681843@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| Space*** wrote:
| > "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:fW%Ef.753945$_o.123268@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | Space*** wrote:
| > | > I already know the SR "fix" and I even know
| > | > the reason they had to do such so the theory could actually
| > | > make some sense at all.
| > | >
| > |
| > | Space***... you say that you know that SR makes sense? I should
| > | hope so, as there has never been a prediction of special relativity
| > | that was contradicted by an observation.
| >
| > Sam,
| > I have not stated SR makes sense in finding causes though.
| > It actually does not find physical cause for anything.
| > It merely predicts stuff and it will have problems if anything
| > that moves close to light speed comes upon things
| > that are not moving close to light speed.
| >
| > SR if continued to be worshipped when humans get into
| > space at high speeds will only cause the same type
| > problems that trains had with clock malfunctions long ago.
| >
| >
|
| What people find compelling about SR is that observation agree
| with its predictions and that it is a valuable too in exploring
| many phenomena in the universe and that it is important in some
| engineering projects.

The train engineers (drivers) and the track engineers agreed with
thier observations of the clock all the time too, until it was too late.
You truly are stuck in the train crashing history.
Still not realizing it is the clocks fault.
Truly history repeating itself with a smaller ticker.
:)


.

Loading