Re: path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:00:26 GMT
In sci.physics, Sam Wormley
<swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 05 Feb 2006 03:46:05 GMT
<1yeFf.755094$_o.493907@attbi_s71>:
Mark Martin wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
Let's go have lunch... I'll buy.
Careful- The cost will be much higher than the price of the meal.
-Mark Martin
I'll bring my baseball bat, and all of Newton's classical mechanics.
Why am I getting this picture of Babe Ruth (or Barry Bonds or
Willie Mays or ...) trying to hit a very lrage book titled
"Principia Mathematica"? :-)
The good news for Spaceman: the error in analyzing the motion
of a 90 mph fastball is on the order of 1.8 * 10^-14. This is
a little more than the distance between two atoms in a C-C
bond (142 pm) every 10 km.
The bad news: there are things that move faster than pitched baseballs.
Much faster.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- References:
- path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- From: Spaceman
- Re: path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- From: Spaceman
- Re: path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- From: Mark Martin
- Re: path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- From: Sam Wormley
- path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- Prev by Date: Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Next by Date: Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- Previous by thread: Re: path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- Next by thread: Re: path travel distance vs start/finish distance
- Index(es):