Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:01:25 -0500
"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dvudnVKvYfI9pHveRVn-uA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FsqFf.1022$1e5.43868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| You are making unwarranted assumptions about the conditions
| of the particles and balls.
No I am not.
I am stating relations that fit just fine.
Please show (mathematically) how they fit.
| If a ball spins longer in
| vacuum and without the need for bearings (because it is
| weightless in free-fall) then this is one thing, and quite
| measurable and characterizable. But elementary particles are
| essentially *always* in vacuum and free fall no matter what
| their environment; they are vastly smaller than the air molecules
| around them and move without restraint or collision for very
| long times and distances.
Vacuum has nothing to do with it.
The gravity does.
The gravitational difference is what causes a slower/faster decay.
Quick test for James: What's the gravity differential
across a 1cm diameter ball in Earth orbit? How about a
muon which is a point particle?
| Muons created in the upper atmosphere by the incidence of
| high energy radiation on atmospheric molecules make it
| all the way to ground level without colliding with anything
| on the way.
Sure,
that is why they don't die as fast as the one on the ground.
Huh? The one's created on the ground enjoy the same
freedom from collisions.
still ball spinning stuff. and gravitational differences.
You need to show *what* gravitational differences and
how these differences effect the lifetime of muon.
Empirical evidence suggests that in this case time dilation
is due to their great velocities, not due to the gravity
difference (its effect is far, far too small to account
for the extended muon lifetimes).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- References:
- Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: RadicalLibertarian
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Bob Cain
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Prev by Date: Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
- Next by Date: Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Previous by thread: Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Next by thread: Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading