Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:49:25 -0500
"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FcmdnZXLe4_16HvenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EBtFf.3485$1e5.91167@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:Au6dnXEMQeHX_nvenZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > So what,
| > No physical proof you are following one muon
| > in it's complete lifetime.
|
| Don't need to. We know where they were created
| and the statistics of the bunch tell the story.
Stats of the bunch tell the story of the one?
LOL
that is funny!
Still no physical proof of the one muon doing such.
Why do you insist on one when there are thousands
to monitor, all doing the same thing?
You have no physical path being watched,
and you have no physical evidence of the muon being
the same muon.
Don't care which particular muon it is if we know
where it came from and how fast it's going in
a straight line trajectory.
wow!
You would never find the real killer of the muon!
How did the single muon die?
The muons are seen to decay at ground level.
We don't need no stinking "how" in physics!
We use the group and the "should be the same" principle.
lol
You're falling back on your need to disregard empirical
evidence when you get backed into a corner. You always
do this when you can't weasle out another way.
| Besides, any longer path would only argue for
| even longer lifetimes.
Or faster speeds.
What can accelerate the muon after it's created?
Interaction cross section is low, mean free path
is large, gravity will have negligible effect.
We know the speed when we detect them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- References:
- Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Bob Cain
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- From: Spaceman
- Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Prev by Date: Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Next by Date: Re: Specifics of the mechanism for the Earth's shape.
- Previous by thread: Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Next by thread: Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading