Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:givFf.4677$1e5.108526@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Why do you insist on one when there are thousands
| to monitor, all doing the same thing?

Thousands doing the same thing
through a static and magnetic field?
wow..
I think you have a funny thing going on there.
They are immune to electrons according to you then?
dang,
and you know one does it the exact same as 999 others
That is pretty wild
and bull*** too.
:)

| > You have no physical path being watched,
| > and you have no physical evidence of the muon being
| > the same muon.
|
| Don't care which particular muon it is if we know
| where it came from and how fast it's going in
| a straight line trajectory.

An you know all thousands go straight?
It is not effected by the curvature of spacetime huh?
Immune to free electrons and air molecules completely?

| The muons are seen to decay at ground level.

That means nothing.
all sorts of things decay faster closer to Earth
than the would in lesser pressure up high.


| You're falling back on your need to disregard empirical
| evidence when you get backed into a corner. You always
| do this when you can't weasle out another way.

The emperical evidence you have is lacking physical
evidence.
Still no physical proof the same muon is what you are measuring.


| What can accelerate the muon after it's created?

What can accelerate electrons after they are lost?

| Interaction cross section is low, mean free path
| is large, gravity will have negligible effect.
| We know the speed when we detect them.

You know the speed how?
You detected it fly by, and timed the exact same muon
a little bit further in it's path?



.

Quantcast