Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fCLFf.9777$1e5.234557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_OidnczpOZzEH3reRVn-uA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:CpAFf.7216$1e5.170391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| > |
| > | This is where your lack of math skills lets you down,
| > | otherwise you wouldn't make such a statement without
| > | checking first. To them the entire atmosphere is
| > | essentially like a hard vacuum. These things have
| > | no measurable size (they're just like really heavy
| > | electrons).
| >
| > No measureable size?
| > so now they are like photons but 207 times the mass
| > of an electron?
|
| What's the size of an electron, James?

Really small Greg.
and right now , non measureable by todays standard
attemts at such.

but a 207 times the mass object is not immune to
1/207th of it's mass

A 207 lb man flying fast through a bunch of 1 lb objects
is not going to change direction ever huh?
:)

| I see that you snipped (chose to ignore) my description
| of the relative kinetic energy of the muon versus
| essentially stationary electrons. Not kosher, James.

No,
you are ignoring my comparisons in larger reality
like the 207 lb man case above.


| Who cares about "ones"? We're looking at a phenomenon
| applicable to all.

If you are trying to find the true life of "one", It is
the one that you have to follow.

| Unless you can show that the muons can arrive with
| essentially the same speed as they were created with
| yet vary in speed on the way down, you are justified
| in taking the speed as essentially constant.

You are refusing to think about what could change
the speed it is falling.
:)

| Incorrect analogy. The muon flux is the wind, while
| the electrons are (rather insignificant) obstacles.

not insignificant.
(1/207) is far from insignificant.

| I'm afraid you'll have to explain anyways, given that
| muons are not gooing to feel pressure from atoms.

there is pressure from free electrons.

|
| > They spin more freely in lesser density
|
| Why? They can't feel pressure from atoms.

density of free electrons
Or do you say there are no free electrons in
the atomosphere?


| So you can't give a reasonable explanation because you
| know you made another error. Fair enough.

No error made here,
I am still wanting physical proof of what you state
about the lifetime of one muon in transit from
upper to lower Earth.
You have no such physical proof.
All you have is abstracted bull*** proof.


.

Quantcast