Re: Consistancy of the speed of light.


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LPNFf.10711$1e5.248514@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:VIGdnQuyZNLkEXrenZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:fCLFf.9777$1e5.234557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:_OidnczpOZzEH3reRVn-uA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | >
| > | > "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | > news:CpAFf.7216$1e5.170391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | > |
| > | > | This is where your lack of math skills lets you down,
| > | > | otherwise you wouldn't make such a statement without
| > | > | checking first. To them the entire atmosphere is
| > | > | essentially like a hard vacuum. These things have
| > | > | no measurable size (they're just like really heavy
| > | > | electrons).
| > | >
| > | > No measureable size?
| > | > so now they are like photons but 207 times the mass
| > | > of an electron?
| > |
| > | What's the size of an electron, James?
| >
| > Really small Greg.
| > and right now , non measureable by todays standard
| > attemts at such.
| >
| > but a 207 times the mass object is not immune to
| > 1/207th of it's mass
| >
| > A 207 lb man flying fast through a bunch of 1 lb objects
| > is not going to change direction ever huh?
| > :)
| >
| > | I see that you snipped (chose to ignore) my description
| > | of the relative kinetic energy of the muon versus
| > | essentially stationary electrons. Not kosher, James.
| >
| > No,
| > you are ignoring my comparisons in larger reality
| > like the 207 lb man case above.
|
| No I didn't; I gave you an explanation (which you snipped)
| involving the kinetic energy.

You did no such thing.
You ruled out a factual multiple impact condition.

| We don't care about the life of one. It's the halflife
| of the particle that we're interested in. Halflife
| is a statistical property that holds for collections
| of particles of a given type.

So you don't care if the "group" is actually
keeping the life longer, or shortening the life?


| How many free electrons are you talking about?
| What's holding all these negatively charged free
| electrons around?

Earth does.
Gravitation does
Static fields do.
Do you think the Earth does not have a static field?

| You need to show how a muon could get from where
| it's created to the ground in less time than the
| halflife, given that we know what the starting and
| ending velocities are, and no mechanism to increase
| its speed on the way down.

FTL, then collisions with denser electron pressure
that slow it down.
(I know. you don't like that simple explanation)
:)

| > You have no such physical proof.
| > All you have is abstracted bull*** proof.
|
| All you do is wave your arms and ignore the data.

I am not ignoring the data at all,
I am simply questioning it.
The data, is based upon a group,
yet such a group, could have many different
internals occuring.
It is all questionable.
Nothing about particles we can not directly
see is absolute right?
:)




.

Quantcast