Re: Measuring time passage
- From: "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:01:26 -0500
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oy4Gf.14511$1e5.383071@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| How can a fact contradict a fact? The only
| contradiction is in your model. Your model
| is in conflict with what actually occurred.
The fact you state, "the clocks run fine in the moving frame".
Is not a fact at all, and proven in the end result.
| > data in flight (the clock does not change rate)
| > data end result (the clock did change rate)
|
| You continue to ignore the facts about the frames
| of reference. This is disengenuous behavior.
No,
you continue to ignore the end results proof that
your frame in motions supposed facts are indeed not
factual at all.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Measuring time passage
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Measuring time passage
- References:
- Re: Measuring time passage
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Measuring time passage
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Measuring time passage
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Measuring time passage
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Measuring time passage
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Measuring time passage
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Measuring time passage
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA.GOV: _Never_ _Ever_ precisely reaching the Schwarzschild radius.
- Next by Date: Re: Electrons in the universe
- Previous by thread: Re: Measuring time passage
- Next by thread: Re: Measuring time passage
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|