Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Feb 2006 04:54:29 -0800
Spaceman wrote:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139353357.380656.210420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Well, I'm glad to see that I've proven *something* to you!
| Now, let's go ahead and expand our view, just as we did earlier.
| Remember when we talked about including the guidestrips and the
| febick-poles in our view?
I am not going any farther with this joke of an experiment you
are pulling until you attempt to prove my board dropping mass
is not simultaneous.
Until you do such.. you have nothing to keep this experiment
you are doing alive.
Since you've been so patient here, I'll go to that thread and respond
to it *briefly*. (As I said before, though, I'm not interested in
replicating the whole discussion in two places.)
I'd like to point out, though, that I've given you the Ground reference
in the ovibert example. I've not taken it away at all.
PD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- References:
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Prev by Date: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Next by Date: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Previous by thread: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Next by thread: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|