Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science


Spaceman wrote:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139423080.796362.314540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| And yet
| 1. You agreed that the procedure for measuring length was correct.
| 2. You agreed (and even helped specify) the clock synchronization
| procedure.

You refused to sync all clocks.
you are a trickly little Relativist worshipper..
LOL


| 3. You found no problem with the experimental verification of the
| constancy of light.

Bull***!
I question that to no end..
It is complete bull***.

again.
If a spaceship travling at .5c passes by a lightsource,
and such lightsource turns on 1 second later.
you are in the thought that the lightsource will pass
the spaceship at 1c still.
(creating a 1.5c speed for that lightsources wave.)
the consistancy of light is the biggest bull*** ever accepted
in physics.

If you are bored shitless by this "illusions are reality" fantasy,
just ask a few times how length contraction occurs at night
(in the abscence of light)
The DHr's disappear-- thread terminated.

Jim G
c'=c+v

.

Quantcast