Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: "Borne" <thorborne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Feb 2006 15:23:05 -0800
For those concerned. This is exactly how they are said to *detect*
quarks.
Remember momentum is inversely proportional to wavelength. So as you
increase the momentum, the wavelength gets smaller. In particle
experiments. When they increase the momentum of the projectile enough
to probe below proton size. They detected that the scattering has
different angles. If proton is just composed of one lump. The
scattering
angle should be the same. But it is not. This can only occur if protons
has sub parts. Years before. A genius called Gel-Mann has already
predicted using calculations that 3 quark out to exist to explain all
the particles being detected. He used a very powerful mathematical
device called Lie Group. This is why our present particle physics
always
talked about Gauge Symmetry, because it is in the elegance of the math
that they can predict many things. Remember Weinberg not only predict
the W force exist but also its mass. This is genius to the extreme.
Particle labs can also produce 3 quarks vertex output from the
collisions.
In the world of particle physics. Mass is inconvertible to energy. For
Thomson. To debunk the existence of quarks. Explain why scattering
experiment using high momentum can produce different scattering of
the proton contents. Also why Gel-Mann was able to predict not only
the existence of quarks but also other particles not yet discovered
using
the powerful Eightfold Way device. BTW... they can't single single
quarks because the strong force is said to get stronger as you pull
the quarks from each other. Is this just Ad Hoc?
Well. Im not exactly a lover of quarks but let's deal with
experimental data. I'd love it too if there are no quarks. To
gain total familiarity with the conceptual and mathematical
foundation of particle physics. I'd suggest this book:
Deep Down Things by Bruce A. Schumm
It's an incredible book because its the middle ground between
pure layman dumb book and graduate level particle book. Look
at the review of it at amazon. All 5 stars. I'd put 5 stars into
it too. It made you so familiar with the Standard Model and
made you understand why physicists are so crazy about it.
To debunk the standard model. Debunk the powerful stuff in
the book.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/080187971X/sr=8-1/qid=1139527140/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-6548531-2651365?%5Fencoding=UTF8
borne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- References:
- Is it our math letting us down?
- From: MuDeltaKappa
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: PD
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: PD
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: PD
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: David Thomson
- Is it our math letting us down?
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading