Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: "MobyDikc" <mobydikc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Feb 2006 14:11:44 -0800
Greg Neill wrote:
"MobyDikc" <mobydikc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139607335.363360.34290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Greg Neill wrote:
The first can easily be translated to:
x0 = 1
dx = 3
T = the set of iterations
y = |T| = the cardinality of set T
then: x = x0 + dx*|T|
How does that step follow from what is given?
It seems to me that they are clearly equal, but I don't know of any
mathematical manuever that says they are.
It looks like we're just doing pattern matching.
Could you write an algorithm that does the same derivation?
Pattern matching can be performed by algorithm.
Ok then. You got me beat. Your math must not be a limitating factor in
science and my computer programs would be a waste of your time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- References:
- Is it our math letting us down?
- From: MuDeltaKappa
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: MobyDikc
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: MobyDikc
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: Creighton Hogg
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: MobyDikc
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: MobyDikc
- Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- From: Greg Neill
- Is it our math letting us down?
- Prev by Date: Re: Upper thermal limit of temperature ("Abolute infinity")
- Next by Date: Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it our math letting us down?
- Index(es):