Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?



In article <b8WdnRvEhNvVLnbenZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Spaceman <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Gregory L. Hansen" <glhansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dsgb82$7b1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In article <45Gdnb-y5PIqOHbeRVn-qQ@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
| Spaceman <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >
| >"Gregory L. Hansen" <glhansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >news:dsg7id$5iq$5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >| In article <RdqdnYdeGLGJknTeRVn-oA@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
| >| Spaceman <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| >| >Please figure supposed actual speeds if using time dilation
| >| >if you dare.
| >| >:)
| >| >
| >| >0.999c = what speed according to time dilation?
| >|
| >| 0.999c
| >|
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >0.7c = what speed according to time dilation?
| >|
| >| 0.7c
| >|
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >0.5c = what speed according to time dilation?
| >|
| >| 0.5c
| >|
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >0.3c = what speed according to time dilation?
| >|
| >| 0.3c
| >|
| >| >
| >| >
| >| >0.1c = what speed accordingto time dilation?
| >|
| >| 0.1c
| >
| >
| >Very good,
| >A person that knows time dilation is full of crap.
| >It will not matter how much the objects in motions
| >clock goof up because it is simply that....
| >a clock malfunction, not a rate of time change itself.
| >If it were a rate of time change, the speeds would not
| >be the same in thier own reference frame.
| >
| >:)
| >
| >
|
|
| You and I have a different interpretation of what those answers mean. The
| numbers I gave were derived from Einstein's special theory of relativity.

The numbers you gave are the physical speeds.
If you use time dilation for such numbers you are just being silly.
and will come up with incorrect speeds since
time dilation is a simple clock malfunction, not a physical reality
change.
The standard of time measurement is based upon a stationery
frame on Earth, using a moving frame relative to Earth frame of reference
is just plain wrong and not standard anymore at all.
:)




Speed in relativity is still the distance traveled divided by the elapsed
time. But to "use time dilation" is silly because dividing a distance
traveled as measured in one frame by an elapsed time as measured in a
different frame is meaningless. If you're the one making the measurement,
then use the distance you measure and the time you measure. If I'm the
one making the measurement then I'll use the distance I measure and the
time that I measure.

--
"Coincidences, in general, are great stumbling blocks in the way of that
class of thinkers who have been educated to know nothing of the theory of
probabilities." -- Edgar Allen Poe
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OBarr comments to the net.
    ... Jeckyl wrote: ... and what might be just a measurement ... frame, when every frame is moving at a different ... departing speed and both of these speeds have to be ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: I am Trying To Learn Relativity
    ... relative to a set of coordinates where observers at rest in the frame ... This is an axiom of Relativity. ... coordinates of the frame in which the measurement is being made. ... then relative and closing speeds must mean the same thing. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Proposal for an experiment to differentiate SRT from LET
    ... 0.6C wrt an inertial frame that we lable "absolute rest frame". ... so particle does not experiences time dilation. ... time dilation can only be "experienced" by means of a measurement ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Contraction has been abolished by Special Relativity
    ... his own rest frame does not mean that it is isotropic when measured ... no such isotropy has been detected. ... "Just as the second postulate does not eliminate closing speeds the ... does not disqualify it from being a measurement. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Principle of Relativity
    ... Both LET and SR have time dilation. ... observed from another frame of reference .. ... Whereas measurement is all that we have to quantify reality with, ... special relativity is what a clock measures. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)