Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?
- From: "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:15:33 GMT
<i.love.jeevitha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139457679.765790.178410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Say there are x, y, z coordinates set up for "some space" on earth,
where the coordinates represent lengths. Say the space is a
playground or a space around some buildings in downtown new york.
If there is a position vector between 2 points in this space, say
between two buildings or something, then the magnitude of this vector
is a length (metres, or whatever). That is the dimension of the
position vector or any vector which this coordinate system is really
set up for is length.
Now if we find the unit vector of the said position vector, it is
dimensionless.
Hardly. You've defined its dimension by "unit" (scalar, value 1) and by
orientation as a vector.
How would one graph the unit vector on this coordinate
system? How would one go about "thinking" about what it really means
to say that this unit vector has magnitude 1? Is that 1m? No.
Err, yes. It is so by definition of unit vector. You can use any units
you like, but once you've chosen inches, miles, meters, strangs, boobles
or whatever you want to call a unit, that's a unit.
A lightyear (ly) is a unit of distance, an Astronomical Unit (AU) is a
unit if distance, an Angstrom is a unit of distance. We choose units
to make the manipulation of numbers easy. It serves no useful purpose
to speak of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Angstroms.
Androcles.
Then what
is it (geometrically) ?
The issues gets even more muddled if we consider forces. Sometimes one
finds the unit vector of a position vector between two points (along a
rope or something) which has a force acting along it. The force vector
can then be determined by multiplying the unit vector by the magnitude
of the force. This obviously means that the unit vector is
dimensionless and can be used to bring about vectors with different
units into the same "x y z" frame. Anyone have an idea about what it
means to say a unit vector has length 1, with respect to thise
coordinate system (which measures lengths)? How can it be graphed in
this xyz frame?
.
- References:
- unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?
- From: i . love . jeevitha
- unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?
- Prev by Date: GTR gets a new life!!!!
- Next by Date: Re: bicycle question - real life event
- Previous by thread: Re: unit vector of a length(position vector) graphed in length based axes?
- Next by thread: Complexity in physics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|